Venter, J.J.Heyns, M.F.Ryke, E.H.Hoogstad, Helena2009-02-172009-02-172005http://hdl.handle.net/10394/787Thesis (M.A. (Philosophy))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2005.This article sets out to explore the hermeneutical problems in the narrative therapeutic theory of Michael White by investigating his understanding of "story" within its interpretative context. In both White's interpretative approach and his “story" are inconsistencies rooted in a meta-theoretical tension based on his account of the autonomy of a person. This tension lies between the postulation of contingency and the pressure of stability. This is shown by testing the sustainability of White's therapeutic approach against the logical consistency of the underlying theoretical and philosophical foundation. The fundamental meta-theoretical tensions are brought to the fore by means of these contradictions.Michael WhiteNarrative therapyNarrativeInterpretationHermeneuticsContingencyAutonomyThesis