Ferreira, G.M.Peach, Joseph Vuyo2008-11-272008-11-272003http://hdl.handle.net/10394/58Thesis (LL.M. (Public Law))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2004.Before 1994 administrative law was dominated by parliamentary supremacy which dictated that Parliament is the supreme law-making authority in the state. This position was radically changed by the new democratic order. To protect the rights of citizens a Bill of Rights was introduced in South Africa. This research focuses on the uncertainty pertaining to the application of the audi alteram partem rule to the proceedings of commissions of inquiry. Section 24 of the interim Constitution, section 33 of the final Constitution and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 were introduced to safeguard the individual against unfair administrative action. These legislative measures as well as applicable case law are analysed in order to establish whether they have brought about greater clarity concerning the application of the audi alteram partem rule to theproceedings of commissions of inquiry.Administrative lawAudi alteram partemBill of RightsCommissionsCommon lawConstitutionConstitutional CourtConstitutional StateExisting rightsFairnessLegitimate expectationNatural justicePrejudiceProcedureRightsRuleThesis