<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-24T02:46:21.493639584Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:repository.nwu.ac.za:10394/42485" metadataPrefix="dim">https://repository.nwu.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:repository.nwu.ac.za:10394/42485</identifier><datestamp>2024-05-10T01:08:28Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10394_26463</setSpec><setSpec>col_10394_26464</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Rautenbach.C</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Müller-Van Der Westhuizen, Caroline</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="researchID">Rautenbach Crista - 11086890 (Supervisor)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2024-05-09T08:36:57Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2024-05-09T08:36:57Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2023-10</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8809-4264</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10394/42485</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Doctor of Laws in Perspective on Law, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Customary law is an integral part of South African law. Various pieces of legislation&#xd;
were enacted under the Constitution , resulting in the statutory regulation of certain&#xd;
aspects of customary law. The primary rationale for doing so is improving women's&#xd;
and children's lives. However, the Children's Act indirectly caters for common law&#xd;
adoption only, and customary law child adoption is excluded. Customary law adoptions&#xd;
are, therefore, dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Customary law adoption is also an&#xd;
area where differentiation between the common and customary law systems creates&#xd;
inequality before the law.&#xd;
The legal implications of customary law adoptions are uncertain, undermining their&#xd;
status. Factors contributing to the uncertainties include the pre-constitutional nonrecognition&#xd;
of customary law, cultural considerations, and a lack of uniform judicial&#xd;
interpretations and other views, including interpreting customary law adoptions as&#xd;
informal or de facto , even under the Constitution . Determining the legal implications&#xd;
of customary law adoptions would require conceptualisation through analysing judicial&#xd;
interpretation and the Children's Act as an option for providing for customary law&#xd;
adoptions. However, determining the legal implications of customary law adoptions&#xd;
first requires understanding the context in which common and customary law&#xd;
adoptions operate; otherwise, legal reform results in paper law.&#xd;
Roman-Dutch law did not recognise adoption, but the need for regulation in South&#xd;
Africa was apparent. Consequently, the first South African common law adoption&#xd;
legislation took effect in 1924. Similarities and differences exist between adoption&#xd;
under Roman law and adoption under customary law. However, it is important to note&#xd;
that the similarities do not mean that customary law adoptions must be assumed to&#xd;
be purely family-centred instead of child-centred. Customary law adoptions have&#xd;
developed, and adoption under customary law is an established practice.&#xd;
On the other hand, Roman law did not affect adoption in Holland; as mentioned,&#xd;
adoption in Roman-Dutch law was not recognised. Therefore, no legal consequences&#xd;
were attached to adoption agreements in the Cape. Yet, a need for regulation arose.&#xd;
The 1923 adoption legislation that took effect in 1924 and the three acts that preceded&#xd;
the Children's Act clarified the legal consequences of adoptions. Informal, unofficial or&#xd;
de facto adoptions did and still do not attract legal consequences under common law.&#xd;
Meanwhile, customary law showed resilience and communities continued to practice&#xd;
their adoption laws in accordance with African values and the workings of the African&#xd;
family. In the African family, a child "belongs". Depending on the parents' marital&#xd;
status, a child may refer to more than one person as "father" and belong to either the&#xd;
father's or the mother's family. Consequently, consent from a to-be-adopted child's&#xd;
biological father or mother is not necessarily needed for a customary law adoption.&#xd;
Members of an African family know that one lives "through" other people.&#xd;
Though African values aim to ensure that every child has a home, the reality is that&#xd;
many African children need a family. Customary law adoptions also occur outside the&#xd;
family set-up, and different "forms" of customary law adoptions have developed;&#xd;
several types of customary law adoptions exist within and outside the family. The&#xd;
motive(s) behind customary law adoption is multi-faceted. The adoptions may not be&#xd;
dismissed for being conducted to save a family from extinction and not having regard&#xd;
for a child's best interests, though the matter of a child's best interests is a study on&#xd;
its own. The generic requirements of a valid customary law adoption are an adoption&#xd;
agreement between the families and the publication of the adoption. Reporting the&#xd;
adoption to a traditional leader was established as a relative requirement as opposed&#xd;
to being obligatory. However, the reality is that there are many practical reasons (such&#xd;
as keeping children safe) why reporting and keeping a record of customary law&#xd;
adoptions should be a validity requirement. Specifics pertaining to customary law&#xd;
adoption agreements and publication must not be unclear. The continued existence of&#xd;
uncertainties in this respect would lead to the piece-meal recognition of customary law&#xd;
adoptions and interpreting, viewing and branding them as de facto , leading to the&#xd;
overall devaluing of the status of customary law.&#xd;
This thesis enquired into the legal implications of customary law adoptions. Determined&#xd;
legal implications of customary law adoptions include conferring ilobolo rights in an&#xd;
adopted daughter on the adoptive parent(s) and conferring an obligation on the&#xd;
adopted parent(s) or their family to deliver ilobolo for their adopted son's first&#xd;
iv&#xd;
marriage. In the context of customary law adoptions, ilobolo does not amount to the&#xd;
buying and selling of a child. The adopted child is provided with their adopted&#xd;
parent(s)' surname and is recognised as their intestate heir with a right to succession.&#xd;
The child has a right to maintenance, too. With customary law adoption, the status of&#xd;
several role-players changes. However, the status of the child and other relevant&#xd;
people may change without the biological parent(s) or the child consenting to the&#xd;
adoption. In some instances, valid adoption also takes place by being inferred.&#xd;
While showing regard for the context in which customary law adoptions operate,&#xd;
legislation must clarify the legal implications of customary law adoptions. The&#xd;
Children's Act must recognise customary law adoptions, particularly removing the risk&#xd;
of abolishing otherwise valid customary law adoptions through the 2020 Children's&#xd;
Amendment Bill .</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="thesistype">Doctral</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">en</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">North-West University (South Africa).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Customary law</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Customary law adoption</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Child adoption</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">African customary law</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">African extended family</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">African values</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Ubuntu</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">ilobolo</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Common law adoption</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Children's Act</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">de facto adoption</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Inequality</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Status of customary law</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Adoption legislation</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Roman law adoption</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">The legal implications of customary law adoptions in South Africa</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>