<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-23T12:22:06.672042808Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:repository.nwu.ac.za:10394/11734" metadataPrefix="dim">https://repository.nwu.ac.za/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:repository.nwu.ac.za:10394/11734</identifier><datestamp>2020-09-16T11:31:58Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10394_26463</setSpec><setSpec>col_10394_26477</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Strydom, C.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor">Wessels, C.C.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author">Labuschagne, Lizette</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="researchID">10060456 - Strydom, Corinne (Supervisor)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="researchID">10063439 - Wessels, Cornelia Cecilia (Supervisor)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2014-10-16T07:16:44Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2014-10-16T07:16:44Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2013</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/10394/11734</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">MSW (Forensic Practice), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The sexual abuse of children presents as an ever-increasing social concern in South-Africa&#xd;
and the rest of the world. A daily newspaper reports that 104 913 serious crimes against&#xd;
children were reported to the South African Police Service (SAPS) since 2010. Another 49&#xd;
550 serious crimes against children were reported during 2012/2013 at the SAPS (Meiring,&#xd;
2013:7).&#xd;
The concept of child sexual abuse only became publically known in the seventies. Since&#xd;
then intense research has been done in an effort to gain a better understanding regarding the&#xd;
concept, causes and effects of child sexual abuse (Herbert, 2000:16). However, not only&#xd;
was knowledge gained regarding the extent of child sexual abuse, but there has also been an&#xd;
increase of knowledge involving the theoretical base of the methods of investigation with&#xd;
regard to child sexual abuse.&#xd;
Through this specific research project the researcher will endeavor to contribute to the&#xd;
existing theoretical knowledge base by researching and describing the benefits of&#xd;
implementing pre-forensic evaluation when investigating the presumed sexual abuse of a&#xd;
child.&#xd;
A summary of The Criminal Law (Sexual offences and related matters) Amendment Act 32 of&#xd;
2007's (South-Africa 2007:25-27) definition of child sexual abuse is as follow: "A sexual&#xd;
offence occurs when any person engages a child (a person under the age of 18) with or&#xd;
without the consent of the child, in a sexual act. Sexual act is defined as an act of sexual&#xd;
penetration or an act of sexual violation. Sexual penetration can be seen as any sexual form&#xd;
of penetration to any extent whatsoever by die genital organ, any body part and/or object by&#xd;
one person into, or beyond, the genital organs, anus or mouth of another person".&#xd;
In order to combat the incidence and increase of child sexual abuse it is imperative that every&#xd;
accusation regarding the possibility of such abuse should be investigated thoroughly. Due to&#xd;
the fact that some children will only disclose sexual abuse when the are in a safe environment, the whole process could be delayed if the child does not feel safe. Johnson&#xd;
(2004:465) postulates that this delay could jeopardize the whole process because when&#xd;
physical healing had occurred the physical evidence could be destroyed. The absence of&#xd;
physical evidence stresses the importance of the implementation of the forensic investigation&#xd;
process.&#xd;
Social workers are regularly required to evaluate children when sexual abuse is suspected.&#xd;
This process often starts with a pre-forensic evaluation in order to ascertain the probability of&#xd;
sexual abuse. If the pre-forensic investigation confirms the possibility of such abuse, the next&#xd;
step is to conduct a formal forensic investigation. Clark (2007:70) explains that this&#xd;
investigation is used to gather relevant factual information required for police investigation&#xd;
and for use in a court of law.&#xd;
Due to the seriousness and sensitivity regarding allegations of child sexual abuse, it is&#xd;
imperative that the social worker should remain neutral and objective at all times. When&#xd;
investigating such allegations Aucamp (2012a:2) advocate three approaches. These&#xd;
approaches are: A blind, history-free, uninformed approach; An informed approach or an&#xd;
allegation-blind approach.&#xd;
It is generally accepted that through the use of the uninformed approach the objectivity of the&#xd;
social worker is enhanced. This is due to the fact that in this approach restricted information&#xd;
is passed on to the social worker, i.e. she has no prior knowledge regarding the perpetrator&#xd;
or the allegations, but only knows the name, gender and age of the specific child (Aucamp,&#xd;
2012a:5). Faller (2007:41-43) declares that in order to ensure objectivity the postulation of&#xd;
alternative hypotheses form part and parcel of the task of the social worker. The social&#xd;
worker is enabled to formulate these varied hypotheses when as much information as&#xd;
possible relevant to the specific situation is collected. The collection of this data ensures that&#xd;
important information does not get lost and that no alternative explanation can be given for&#xd;
the allegations.&#xd;
Hewitt (1999:214) points out that many factors can add to the child's inability to cooperate&#xd;
during a formal forensic investigation. Du Plessis (2012:1) therefore recommends a socioemotional&#xd;
evaluation which will enable the investigator to understand the child's cognitive,&#xd;
social, emotional, speech and language development as well as the scope of his attention&#xd;
span and level of cooperation. The gathering of all this information is made possible because&#xd;
of the structured nature of the pre-forensic evaluation process. Within the scope of the forensic field the term and concept 'pre-forensic evaluation' is&#xd;
relatively new. This process is regarded as a mechanism to sift through data in order to&#xd;
evaluate the child's level of development as well as the social and behavior issues within the&#xd;
focus of the extended forensic investigation process (Carnes, Nelson-Gardell, Wilson &amp;&#xd;
Orgasa, 2001:238).&#xd;
The objective of this research project was to establish the benefits of the pre-forensic&#xd;
evaluation as the starting point for investigating child sexual abuse in order to make&#xd;
recommendations.&#xd;
In this research the researcher used a qualitative approach which implies a broad approach&#xd;
to the study of social phenomena by implementing a variety of research methods. As this&#xd;
field of forensics is relatively new in South- Africa, the researcher is of the opinion that this&#xd;
research will add to the theoretical and empirical base of knowledge regarding the benefits of&#xd;
the pre-forensic evaluation as part of the extended forensic investigation process.&#xd;
The following participants were involved and methods utilized to reach the objective of this&#xd;
explorative study:&#xd;
-  8 registered social workers , resident in Gauteng;&#xd;
-  10 client files projecting the use of the pre-forensic investigation process in the lives&#xd;
of children between ages 3 and 6 and where possible sexual abuse was suspected.&#xd;
The methods of data collection involved semi-structured interviews as well as document&#xd;
analysis. Data was processed by means of transcriptions, which elicited various themes and&#xd;
sub-themes which in turn led the researcher to come to specific conclusions in order to make&#xd;
certain recommendations.&#xd;
-  All 8 participating registered social workers have applied the pre-forensic evaluation&#xd;
as starting point of the investigation into allegations of sexual abuse;&#xd;
-  All 8 participating registered social workers preferred to follow the uninformed&#xd;
approach and agreed on the benefits of this process;&#xd;
All respondents agreed on the following benefits of the pre-forensic evaluation process:&#xd;
-  It provides a holistic view on the child's socio-emotional functioning;&#xd;
-  It improves and enhances objectivity and neutrality on the part of the investigator and&#xd;
the investigation; -  It enables the researcher to complete a competency evaluation of the child within a&#xd;
non-threatening environment;&#xd;
-  It provides ample opportunity for the social worker to build rapport with the child;&#xd;
-  It provides guidelines to be followed during the formal forensic investigation process.&#xd;
The researcher also found that none of the participants relayed specific disadvantages&#xd;
regarding the use of the pre-forensic evaluation process.&#xd;
Another theme which crystallized when data was analyzed was that the pre-forensic&#xd;
evaluation structure is sufficient to serve as a screening instrument.&#xd;
The following practical recommendations came to the fore in the process of data analysis:&#xd;
-  To divide the pre-forensic evaluation process into two or more sessions;&#xd;
-  To allow only trained professional workers to implement the pre-forensic evaluation&#xd;
process;&#xd;
-  To standardize the pre-forensic evaluation process for investigating presumed sexual&#xd;
offences;&#xd;
-  That pre-forensic evaluation be utilized in the case of all children in need of care and&#xd;
not only when sexual abuse is suspected;&#xd;
In conclusion, with regard to future research themes the researcher would like to propose the&#xd;
following:&#xd;
-  The evaluation of valid evaluation techniques which could be included in the preforensic&#xd;
evaluation structure;&#xd;
-  The evaluators' experience and perception regarding the pre-forensic evaluation&#xd;
structure;&#xd;
-  The effectiveness of using the pre-forensic evaluation structure as a screening&#xd;
instrument;&#xd;
-  The reactions and perceptions shown by members of the SAPS and Social Welfare&#xd;
Services with regard to using information that was gathered and passed on to them by&#xd;
means of pre-forensic reports.&#xd;
The researcher believes that this research successfully showed the benefits of the preforensic&#xd;
evaluation process when investigating suspected cases of child sexual abuse. She&#xd;
also believes that if the recommendations of this study would be followed, the whole&#xd;
processed could be streamlined and if the suggested themes were explored, the base of knowledge regarding the pre-forensic evaluation structure would be broadened to benefit all&#xd;
parties involved in this process.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="thesistype" lang="en_US">Masters</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">other</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Pre-forensiese evaluering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Forensiese ondersoekproses</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Seksuele misbruik van ‘n kind</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Pre-forensic evaluation</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Forensic evaluation process</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Child sexual abuse</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="afr">Voordele van die pre–forensiese evaluering as deel van die forensiese ondersoekproses rakende seksuele misbruik van 'n kind</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">open.access</dim:field>
</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>