Jàmbá - Journal of Disaster Risk Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-845X, (Print) 1996-1421 Page 1 of 6 Original Research Gender mainstreaming: A lasting solution to disaster risk reduction Authors: Disasters threaten resources as well as displace millions of people globally. It is undisputable Jestina Chineka1 1 that disasters have gender dimensions. However, most African countries are still lagging Agnes Musyoki Edmore Kori1 behind as far as the holistic integration of gender mainstreaming into national policies, Hector Chikoore1 particularly on Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR). The purpose of this article was to unpack the consequence of overlooking gender in DRR, thereby highlighting its importance. The study Affiliations: 1 followed a comparative study design, by using two case studies of Mumbwa District in Department of Geography and Geo-Information Science, Zambia and Chivi District in Zimbabwe. The specific objectives were to examine the disaster University of Venda, risks in both Mumbwa and Chivi districts, analyse the DRR strategies used in both districts Thohoyandou, South Africa and highlight the critical success factors derived from gender mainstreaming in DRR in these cases. Findings showed that gender mainstreaming is not only an important tool in DRR but Corresponding author: Jestina Chineka, also a sustainable development initiative. Despite challenges faced by countries in DRR, jessiench@gmail.com gender mainstreaming should always be considered as their first line of action in DRR. Dates: Keywords: Disaster Risk Reduction; Gender Mainstreaming; Sustainable Development; Received: 10 July 2018 Holistic Integration; Overlooking Gender; First Line of Action. Accepted: 01 Aug. 2018 Published: 04 July 2019 How to cite this article: Introduction Chineka, J., Musyoki, A., Kori, E. & Chikoore, H., 2019, Disaster risks threaten economies and livelihoods in many African countries. According to the ‘Gender mainstreaming: International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction (ISDR 2004), Africa is the only continent with A lasting solution to disaster an increasing disaster trend in the past decade. With climate change effects becoming a reality in risk reduction’, Jàmbá: the 21st century, a multiplicity of challenges and vulnerabilities which might be having gender Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 11(3), a723. https:// connotations have surfaced. Despite the improvements in information technology, education doi.org/10.4102/jamba. and growing economies, Millennium Development Goals Report (2014) describes multiple and v11i3.723 interdependent challenges that have exposed African countries to disaster risks. Recent researches by ISDR (2004), Joseph-Brown and Tuiloma-Sua (2012) and Turnbull, Sterrett and Copyright: © 2019. The Authors. Hilliboe (2013) show that women are affected by disasters more than men, and therefore, women Licensee: AOSIS. This work can play a crucial role in disaster management if they are integrated into Disaster Risk Reduction is licensed under the (DRR) plans. International frameworks such as the Hyogo Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction Creative Commons Attribution License. (2005–2015) place gender issues at the centre of disaster management. African countries including Zambia and Zimbabwe are facing a myriad of challenges with regard to different kinds of disasters. According to Chaguta (2010), most African countries demonstrate limited capacity to develop sustainable DRR programmes. The major research question behind this article is: How critical is gender mainstreaming in DRR programmes? Study aim and objectives The aim of this study was to highlight gender mainstreaming as an imperative and holistic, cost-effective and long-term solution to DRR using two cases from Zambia and Zimbabwe. This aim is addressed by the following objectives: 1. to examine the disaster risks in both Mumbwa and Chivi districts 2. to analyse the DRR strategies used in both districts 3. to highlight the critical success factors derived from gender mainstreaming in DRR in these cases. Read online: The study area Scan this QR Mumbwa District lies in the western part of the Central Province of Zambia. According to the code with your smart phone or Central Statistical Office of Zambia (2010), Mumbwa District has a population of 226 177 of which mobile device women constituted more than half of the total population. The area has an average annual to read online. maximum temperature of 30°C, with mean annual rainfalls ranging between 600 mm and 800 mm http://www.jamba.org.za Open Access Page 2 of 6 Original Research (Ministry of Tourism and Arts [Zambia] 2018). As such, contextualisation of the two case areas and in gaining better drought frequency in Mumbwa District has increased to understanding of the outcomes. The comparative research below the traditionally known 10-year interval (James-Sebro design helped to highlight the different approaches of the 2005). Drought risks in the Mumbwa District also include two cases to DRR and the success factors to DRR. reduced agricultural production, water shortages, loss of livestock, malnutrition and poverty (Petrie et al. 2016). To Data analysis was performed by comparing the two cases by reduce the risks of drought, an international organisation using international organisations standards as benchmarks. called Heifer International introduced the Pass on the Gift Strategies from the United Nations International Strategy for Programme in 2005 in Mumbwa District; the programme’s Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) such as the Post 1999 Strategy, main objective was to help the community adapt to drought the Hyogo Framework on DRR (2005) and the Sustainable shocks through empowering women. In this programme, Livelihoods Framework were employed in this study. This women in Mumbwa District were given heifers, which they study also employs a theoretical framework from Sen’s would pass on the calf to a fellow member in the programme. Capabilities Theory (1989) to demonstrate the role of women’s Livestock is a crucial asset in drought-prone areas. It is a capabilities in DRR programmes. Cross patterns from both source of the much needed proteins both in meat and milk, case studies (Mumbwa and Chivi districts) were examined as well as being used as draught power by many rural and interpreted based on the themes generated by the households. objectives, the analytical framework and case outcomes. The methodological flow adopted starts with case study selection, For the second case study, Chivi District located southwest of case outcomes and then interpretation of results. the Masvingo Province in Zimbabwe was chosen. Chivi District has a population of 166 049, with women forming a Literature review majority – 54.5% (ZimSat 2012). Like in Mumbwa District of Zambia, Chivi District of Zimbabwe also experiences Gender mainstreaming concept drought-induced disasters. The drought frequency in Chivi Gender mainstreaming is a strategy for gendered concerns District lies at an interval of 3–5 years (Mudzonga 2012). and experiences to be integrated into design, policies and Drought risks in Chivi District include dwindling water programmes in all spheres (World Health Organisation resources, lack of food and deepening poverty (source). The 2010). According to ECOSOC (1997), gender mainstreaming Government of Zimbabwe through the Ministry of Lands is the process of evaluating gender dimensions of any and Agricultural Resources supported by the International planned action, legal framework and programme for a Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) specific area at all stages. Tsui, Hearn & Young (2014), introduced the Conservation Farming Programme in 2004 to defined it as the reorganisation, improvement, development reduce drought shocks through sustainable farming. This and evaluation of policy processes so that gender equality programme entailed conservative farming practices such as is incorporated in all policies at all levels and stages. This is digging planting basins, mulching and crop rotation. The conceded by Alston (2014), who described it as a globally main objective of this initiative was to reduce the effect of accepted strategy for promoting gender equality. They drought by enhancing agricultural productivity. argue that mainstreaming is not an ending solution but a strategy to achieve gender equality by ensuring that it forms Materials and methods the centre of all activities, plans and policies of development. This article is a desktop research based on studies conducted Sustainable Development Goal number 5 seeks to achieve by James-Sebro (2005) and Heifer (2010) in the Mumbwa gender equality and empower all women and girls District of Zambia and studies conducted by Mazvimavi et al. (UN Women 2015). It targets to end all forms of discrimination (2010) and Gukurume, Nhodo & Mafongoya (2010) in Chivi and violence against women. It recognises that women have District of Zimbabwe. The main themes of these two studies were to build resilient communities through harnessing a role to play in their communities, and hence, there is a need livestock and to ensure food security in drought-prone rural to evade gender inequality, especially in DRR. communities through conservative farming practices. Both cases aimed to reduce the knock-on effects of drought. Why gender mainstreaming in disaster However, their execution differed in that the Chivi case risk reduction? sought to improve productivity through green agriculture, Disaster, according to the ISDR (2004), refers to the disruption whereas the Zambian case strengthened communities through of the community’s functionality, resulting in human, empowering women with livestock. economic and environmental losses to an extent that the community cannot cope without external support. And risk The article follows a comparative research design, a research is defined as the function of a hazard and vulnerability, that methodology that aims to make comparisons across different is, Risk = Hazard × (Vulnerability ˗ Capacity) (Joseph-Brown spatial locations, principles or values. Camari (2008) defines 2012). Both women and men face challenges that increase it as the juxtaposition of values shared by two or more cases their vulnerability to disaster, in relation to their differentiated or a method to analyse relationships between phenomena social and economic orientation. Turnbull et al. (2013) note and their casual connections. This design is critical in the that people’s distinct socio-economic clusters shape their http://www.jamba.org.za Open Access Page 3 of 6 Original Research disaster experiences. It is within this breadth that it becomes critical success factors derived from gender mainstreaming imperative to integrate all gender concerns in disaster by using a comparative case analysis of the districts of management. Mumbwa in Zambia and Chivi in Zimbabwe. Global change has become a fact of life, and disasters are on the Disaster risks under case studies increase. Turnbull et al. (2013) highlight that the frequency of disasters is increasing since 1970s globally. IPCC (2007) predicts Chivi District despite being a drought prone area, the an increase of 1.1 °C to 6.4 °C in global surface warming by economy base is centred on agriculture. The small holder 2100. The increase in global warming means further melting of farmers in this community often have their livestock and ice caps in polar regions, rise of sea levels, drier arid regions, crop production disrupted by the several episodes of floods and droughts. There is a real need to come up with drought experienced in the area. Food insecurity is a major effective strategies in disaster risk reduction. issue in the area. According to Chineka (2016), drought exposes the Chivi community across all gender lines. International organisations recognise the importance of gender The Household Vulnerability Index weighing vulnerability mainstreaming if disaster reduction plans are to be sustainable. across physical, social, human, financial and natural assets The United Nations International Strategy for Disaster of each household showed that resilience linked more to Reduction (UNISDR) Hyogo Framework for Action (2005– economic and social network issues. Mazvimavi et al. (2010) 2015) views gender as an integral part in disaster risk noted that half of the Zimbabwean population are food management, and hence, it should be incorporated into policies and nutrition insecure. In response to this risk, several and plans. The Millennium Developmental Goal number 3 drought adaptation programmes were initiated including places gender equality as one of the vital tools in development. conservation farming. Women and men continue to have different access to vital Drought coupled with diseases caused a huge cattle loss in resources globally because of cultural and societal values Mumbwa District. According to Heifer (2010), farming became and expectations. In Africa and many Asian countries, most labour-intensive, farming plots were reduced and women women still lack access to crucial resources which can add abandoned their protein-rich crop fields to work on their their resilience. Musyoki and Khayesi (2012) note that most men’s staple food crop plots, as men migrated to urban areas women lack access to land, livestock and financial capital seeking employment. Agricultural production dwindled. The which are critical in reducing vulnerabilities to disasters. Also, their traditional gender roles of household caretaking community became food and nutrition insecure. Heifer reduce their mobility and social networking. Few et al. introduced multi-purpose draught cattle programme that (2004), citing the Mozambique floods disaster, concede this could easily be managed by women, in a non-stereotypic view and add that women’s confinement to households and approach. caregiving make them often lose their lives to save others. Chivi and Mumbwa disaster risk reduction The rise in disasters globally makes careful planning and strategies a holistic approach to DRR critical. Disasters are now believed Conservation farming in Chivi targeted to reduce drought to be a manifestation of poor planning and weak policies. shocks through increasing agricultural production. It According to Turnbull et al. (2013), disasters are an avoidable sought to alleviate drought risk through sustainable green interruption which requires effective systems and sustainable farming. Farmers participated on voluntary basis. They strategies. They go without say that gender inequality is one allocated 0.1 hectares of their land for conservation farming. of the weak lines of many disaster policies globally. To maximise water and manure, farmers would only plant crops in prepared pits. The programme empowered farmers This draws this article back to the view that drought risks cut with sustainable farming practices such as mulching and across the social fabric and are divided or shaped by age, integrated pest management. According to Gukurume et al. ethnicity, physical ability and gender. Hence, the socially (2010), conservation project brought several conflicts and excluded and economically insecure are worst affected. challenges. Farmers who were participating were shunned Gender mainstreaming becomes critical especially in the by fellow community members who preferred food relief. patriarchal African communities. It goes without saying that The project was too labour-intensive. Farmers became effective DRR programmes must be engendered. reluctant to increase their plots. Ethical consideration Mumbwa adopted the pass on the gift programme. This This article followed all ethical standards for a research intervention targeted mostly women, men and youth. A without direct contact with human or animal subjects. heifer would be passed to a family under the ownership of a woman, and if it produces, they would pass the calf to the Results and discussion next person on the list. The conservation farming programme in Chivi tackled drought from the farmer’s angle, whereas In this section, the article highlights the disaster risks the pass on the gift sought to reduce drought vulnerability experienced, the DRR strategies adopted, as well as the through empowering women. This cattle provision project http://www.jamba.org.za Open Access Page 4 of 6 Original Research aimed to build economic and environmental resilience Lessons from Mumbwa and Chivi through building self-reliant community by increasing crop Overlooking gender issues in DRR programmes is not only yields and nutrition as well as promoting agro-ecological farming. This was achieved by building the capacity of the overlooking of women and men dilemmas but also a rural women and men. Both women and men were trained shear negligence of root causes of disaster shocks in the in rearing cattle. The project targeted social development communities. Analysing the social construct of disasters, through gender integration. The project was a huge success, Enarson (2005) notes that women and men have short- and and communities formed their own co-operatives from this long-term needs in any disaster. Hence, excluding their project. It spread to other communities and was adopted by participation will be excluding their needs and potentials to other NGOs such as World Vision. adapt to the shocks and capacitate themselves to future disasters. DRR approach in disaster management seeks to Although both programmes sought to reduce drought promote community resilience through early warning risks, they reflect critical gender dimensions. The Chivi case systems and sustainable addressing of long-term crisis. This bundled farmers as a homogenous entity. Chivi District however to succeed would need disaster shocks to be has a high female population which constitute most the nipped in the bud, and hence, gender integration is the way smallholder farmers. Mumbwa case study brought in to achieve this. Capacitating communities and giving them gender paradigm. It is also crucial to note that although the a say in their issues promotes independence and a sense of Heifer project targeted to empower women, it integrated proprietorship. In Mumbwa, communities formed a men as well, which is gender mainstreaming in its holistic multiple of society projects after the pass on the Gift sense. Although addressing the past gender inequalities in programme because of interior motivation, although some patriarchal societies is important, the fact is that men still demo plots for conservation agriculture in Chivi were make decision in critical issues and are also vulnerable to neglected. Exclusion of beneficiaries does not only result in disaster shocks, hence the need to harmonise both parties white elephant projects but also makes the projects and allow them to showcase their capabilities. unsustainable. According to Sen ’s Capabilities Theory (1989), leaving out a certain gender means leaving out a Critical success factors on disaster risk reduction portion of the society, yet success of any developmental project is depended on people’s capabilities, which vary Mumbwa District project tackled disaster management from across the board. Hence, it is not only about gender but grass-roots level, in which community members participated community capabilities integration. in every step of the intervention programme. Mumbwa project’s success rests on the inclusive approach more Gender is a sensitive topic in rural communities, and hence specifically on gender integration. The project ran almost to address, it would require more subtle approaches to concurrently with gender education, monitoring and achieve gender balance. Gender awareness training, a reviewing. According to Heifer (2010), the initial step for a continuous assessment and review of gender projects would group to be co-opted into the programme, it had to have a in the long run build gender equity. Conservation agriculture 50% women membership to avoid repeating of the Women is eco-friendly and has a potential to boost productivity; in Development concept. Couples were encouraged to join however, it is labour-intensive. For people in Chivi to have and contracts of family ownership of livestock were signed to encourage family integration. Women contributing 70% appreciated it more, the community plot (Munda wezunde of global disaster victims and gendered asymmetries raMambo) could have been made the demo plot, and then characterising disaster shocks, gender mainstreaming is the community work collectively and reap the benefits of it. most sustainable tool in DRR (FAO 2007). Although statistics This would have maintained the traditional practices and show women domination in subsistence farming, in rural strengthen social cohesion against a disaster risk, which is areas such as Chivi, cultural values are still intact; women crucial in building resilient communities. might be involved in farming, but the land and decision- making remain a male head’s role. It is vital to note that the success of the Mumbwa District project was not only hinged on gender integration, but also on Conservation agriculture being a sound, environmentally community capabilities. Most rural programmes fail because friendly approach, it is a fact that it is labour-intensive and of exclusion of some community members. Social cohesion is adds on to the high demanding gender roles of women. crucial for any development. In rural communities, societal Gender mainstreaming opens up the real needs of the acceptance matters and so are their perspectives, and hence, community and results in responsive and sustainable projects residents do not operate in isolation. For DRR programmes formulation. The life span of the conservation agriculture like any other community programmes to be sustainable, project in Chivi was dependent on donor support. Gukurume they have to promote social cohesion, seek to empower et al. (2010) note the 29.3% withdrawal of farmers in 2011–2012 the beneficiaries, preserve traditional practices and integrate when the donors pulled out. A project falling apart after gender and youth practically. The sustainability concept donors have pulled the plug reflects failure to capacitate supports this and highlights that economic development and communities as well as a lack of project buy-in by its environmental sustainability cannot be achieved in isolation beneficiaries that is common in top–down project designs. of the social aspect. In human livelihoods, gender forms the http://www.jamba.org.za Open Access Page 5 of 6 Original Research core of the social continuum. Hence to address issues that climate change, focus has shifted from adapting to scouting affect any society, the core must be levelled and rationalised for sustainable adaptation strategies. Hence, continuous to accept new developments. monitoring and evaluation of adaptation projects is vital to ensure disaster reduction in communities. Future research Conclusion can seek effective ways for rural communities to adapt to climate change and its related risks without necessarily This article concludes that disasters affect communities, and disrupting the social systems and creating gender conflicts. these units are not homogenous. They are underlined by thick social dimensions in which gender plays an integral part, especially in the African context. Results of this study Acknowledgements showed that gender mainstreaming was Mumbwa’s secret This paper was presented at the first National Conference to the success of its DRR projects. Lacking thereof it in on Disaster Risk Science and Management in ‘South Chivi’s case weakened the Conservation Agriculture Project. Africa’s Response in a changing global environment’, Recognition of gender lines does not only address social 02–04 March 2015, at the Ranch Resort, Polokwane, injustices in communities but also builds social cohesion, South Africa, jointly hosted by the University of Venda, thereby strengthening social networks that are vital in DRR. School of Environmental Sciences, South Africa, and Hence, gender mainstreaming is not only a critical tool in National Disaster Management Centre (representing DRR but also a vital step towards sustainable development. Department of Cooperative Governance), South Africa. Gender mainstreaming must compliment all set of activities Faculty collaborators: Mr Tendayi Gondo, Prof. Agnes in any DRR programme. Governments should get more Musyoki and Mr Edmore Kori. involved in community programmes by prioritising women’s and men’s capabilities. I (Ms Jestina Chineka) would like to thank my co-authors, Professor A. Musyoki, Mr E. Kori and Dr H. Chikoore for This study also recommends that there should not be a their unwavering support and guidance throughout this disparity between the gender mainstreaming frameworks research. A special mention goes to the Jamba Journal and the reviewers for this opportunity. and communities they are drawn for. This is common with generic frameworks that tend to overlook the subtle social lines binding every community. A top–down approach to a Competing interests disaster project management is detrimental to disaster risk The authors declare that they have no financial or personal reduction. Communities need to own a project for them to relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them build an intrinsic motivation towards its success, and only in writing this article. this can yield a sustainable project. Authors’ contributions It is undisputable that rural women carry a heavy workload as far as gender roles are concerned. This makes them J.C. came up with the concept and drafted the article by using immobile and lack social networks and ultimately vulnerable inputs from co-authors and reviewers. A.M. contributed on when disasters strike. Hence, DRR projects should take gender issues, H.C. contributed with the drought concepts cognisance of this – labour-intensive projects such as and E.K. advised on the use of comparative study design. the conservation farming add an extra burden. Better technologies can be sought to ensure adaptability of these Funding Information communities to disaster risks. Drought-resistant crop This research received no specific grant from any funding varieties can be researched and be used in the area instead agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. of changing the farming system. Chivi is a patriarchal community; women manage farms on Data availability statement behalf of their husbands. Hence, major decisions such as Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data changing the farming system will take time to implement were created or analysed in this study. as they must be made by men who in most cases work far off the family compound. Moreover, conservation Disclaimer farming practices such as Dhiga udye create gender tension. Smallholder farmers in Chivi who are mostly women use The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of mixed farming method; they grow crops and practise the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or livestock ranching. Using the crop residues for mulching position of any affiliated agency of the authors. instead of storing it for cattle feed use in dry periods will create tension with their spouses who own most of the cattle. References Sustainable disaster risk reduction projects seek to integrate Alston, M., 2014, Gender mainstreaming and climate change, Women’s Studies Forum gender through sound gender-mainstreamed project designs 47(B), 287–294. Camari, D., 2008, Introduction to the comparative method with Boolean algebra, and implementation plans. Faced with increasing effects of University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen. http://www.jamba.org.za Open Access Page 6 of 6 Original Research Chaguta, T., 2010, Climate change vulnerability and preparedness in Southern Africa: Joseph-Brown, L.S. & Tiuloma-Sua, D., 2012, Intergrating gender in disaster Zimbabwe country report, Heinrich Boll Stiftung, Cape Town. management in small island developing states: a guide UNDP, UNDP, Cuba. Chineka, J., 2016, Drought incidence, gender vulnerability and adaptation in Chivi Mazvimavi, K., Ndlovu, P.V., Nyathi, P. & Minde, I.J., 2010, ‘Conservation agriculture South, Master’s dissertation, University of Venda, Thohoyandou. practices and adoption by small holder farmers in Zimbabwe’, Poster presented at Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) 1997, Mainstreaming the gender perspective the African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE) and 48th Agricultural into all policies and programmes in the United Nations System, United Nations, Economists Association of South Africa (AEASA) conference, Cape Town, South Africa, Geneva. September 19-23, 2010, n.p. Enarson, E., 2005, Gender equality in disasters: Six principles for engendered relief and Ministry of Tourism and Arts (Zambia), 2018, Non-Detrimental findings report for reconstruction, Gender and Disaster Network, n.p. African leopard sport hunting in Zambia, Ministry of Tourism, Lusaka. FAO, 2007, Climate change and food security: A framework for action: Report by an Mudzonga, E., 2012, Farmers’ adaptation to climate change in Chivi District, Interdepartmental Working Group on Climate Change, FAO, Rome. Zimbabwe, Trade and Development Centre, Harare. Few, R., Mike, M., Matthies, F. & Kovats, S., 2004, Floods, health and climate change: Musyoki, A. & Khayesi, M., 2012, Environment and development selected themes from a strategic review, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, n.p. Eastern and Southern Africa, Printing and Publishing Company Botswana Private Limited, Gaborone. Gukurume, S., Nhodo, L. & Mafongoya, O., 2010, ‘Conservation farming and the food security- insecurity matrix in Zimbabwe: A case of ward 21 Chivi Rural’, Journal of Petrie, B., Petrik, D., Martin, L., Chapman, A., Davies, R. & Blignaut, J.N., 2016, Sustainable Development in Africa 12(7), 39–52. Strengthening climate resilience in the Kafue sub-basin (SCRiKA) project: Final report, OneWorld Sustainable Investments, Cape Town. Heifer, 2010, Women farmers building community resilience through harnessing crops and livestock: Best Practices and Innovations (BPI) initiative, agriculture and rural Sen, A.,1989, ‘Development as capability expansion’, Journal of Development Planning livelihoods, viewed from www.heifer.org 19, 41–58. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015, Building resilience of nations and Tsui, J., Hearn, S. & Young, J., 2014, Monitoring and evaluation of policy influence and communities to disaster, viewed 20 June 2014, from http://www.unisdr.org/we/ advocacy: Shaping policy for development, ODI Working paper 395, London. coordinate/hfa Turnbull, M., Sterrett, C.L. & Hilliboe, A., 2013, Towards resilience: A guide to disaster International Strategy on Disaster Reduction (ISDR), 2004, Terminology: basic terms of risk reduction and climate change, Catholic Relief Services, UK. disaster risk reduction, UNISDR, Geneva. UN Women, 2015, ‘Progress of the world’s women 2015-2016: Transforming economies, International Strategy on Disaster Reduction (ISDR), 2008, Gender perspectives: realising rights, Chapter 2’, viewed 20 June 2014, from www.unwomen.org/en2015/ Integrating disaster risk reduction into climate change adaptation, Good practices chapter2/ and lessons learned, UNISDR, Geneva. World Health Organisation, 2011, Gender mainstreaming in WHO: where are we now? IPCC, 2007, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Intergovernmental Panel Report of the baseline assessment of the WHO gender strategy, World Health on Climate Change, United Nations, Geneva. Organisation, Geneva. James-Sebro, M., 2005, Revealing the power of gender mainstreaming, enhancing Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency (ZIMSAT), 2012, Census 2012 preliminary report, development effectiveness of non-governmental organisation Africa, InterAction, n.p. Central Statistics Office, Harare. http://www.jamba.org.za Open Access