Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurger, Trinette
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-11T13:38:08Z
dc.date.available2009-02-11T13:38:08Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/536
dc.descriptionThesis (LL.M. (Estate Law))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2005.
dc.description.abstractThere are several statutory provisions which provide for the rehabilitation of environmental degradation and damage caused by mining activities. These statutory provisions are among others contained in the Mineral Act', the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act and the National Environmental Management Act which stipulates that prospect- or mining activities may only commence once financial provision is made for the rehabilitation of the environment after the completion of mining activities. This provision must be sufficient to cover all expenditure for the rehabilitation of the environment. Such financial provision can be made by taking the responsibility upon oneself by contributing directly into a rehabilitation fund. This fund can take the form of a trust, a section 21-company or a closed corporation. This dissertation is an investigation into which of the aforesaid options will be the most beneficial for the establishment of such a rehabilitation fund. The most important consideration in this investigation is the fact that the chosen rehabilitation fund should be safe to debtor claims against the estate of the establisher (the owner of the mining rights) should he be sequestrated or his business (which could be a one man business, a partnership, a company or a closed corporation) be liquidated. After careful consideration and an investigation of all the legal principles of each of the options a rehabilitation fund could take on, the conclusion is made that all three of the options considered will enjoy the same amount of protected against the sequestration of the establisher or the liquidation of his business. It is clear that all three the investigated options will be suitable to be used as a rehabilitation fund. Yet all three these options are not equally efficient. In the case of a section 21-company the establishment thereof is a complicated and expensive, while the procedure for the establishment of a closed corporation or a trust is less complicated. The establishment of a trust is subjected to the least formalities. In the light of the above mentioned facts it is my submission that a trust would be the most efficient form for a rehabilitation fund.
dc.publisherNorth-West University
dc.titleDie gebruik van 'n rehabilitasiefonds as boedelbeplanningsinstrument vir die sakeman : 'n kritiese ontledingafr
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.thesistypeMasters


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record