Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDu Plooy, H.J.G.
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Ihetteen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-29T07:27:19Z
dc.date.available2011-09-29T07:27:19Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/4814
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A. (Afrikaans and Dutch))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation attempts to investigate the intertextual modus operandi in the oeuvre of H.J. Pieterse, with specific focus on his volumes, Alruin (1989) and Die burg van hertog Bloubaard (2000). The overarching purpose of the investigation is to prove that the author not only uses intertextuality in the sense that one text (literary text) refers to another text (literary and non–literary), or that one text influences another. Pieterse engages in conversation with other texts and re–writes these texts by repositioning them in another context and by adding additional metaphoric meaning to them. The author allows these texts to exchange conversation, to mutually influence one another, and this has as a result that, in his poems, his poetry and his oeuvre, metaphoric lines come into being, which lend a layered meaning to these texts and enrich the possibilities of their interpretation. Thus, a play on multiple meaning develops, which moves between texts: written texts, literary texts, non–literary texts, the author, the reader and the context(s). The conclusion to which this dissertation comes, is that the above mentioned manifestations of meanings, which exist and come into existence within the physically confines of the text, expand this text to a less confined existence in terms of meaning, more unlimited and unbound than what is necessarily allowed by the physically confined nature of the written text. The question thus arises of how the physically limited text take possession of and draws into the texts what lies beyond its physical confines to produce meaning, and how this tension around the limits of the literary text is functionally used. Consequentially, the question that follows is how this happens in the oeuvre of H.J. Pieterse and how the author uses his poetic technique to go beyond the confines of the written text.en_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University
dc.subjectH.J. Pieterseen_US
dc.subjectAlruinen_US
dc.subjectDie burg van hertog Bloubaarden_US
dc.subjectIntertekstualiteiten_US
dc.subjectIntratekstualiteiten_US
dc.subjectMetatekstualiteiten_US
dc.subjectHipertekstualiteiten_US
dc.subjectMikhail Bakhtinen_US
dc.subjectJulia Kristevaen_US
dc.subjectRoland Barthesen_US
dc.subjectGérard Genetteen_US
dc.subjectMichael Riffaterreen_US
dc.subjectHarold Bloomen_US
dc.subjectPostmodernisme en intertekstualiteiten_US
dc.subjectDekonstruksie en intertekstualiteiten_US
dc.subjectInvloed en intertekstualiteiten_US
dc.subjectDialogismeen_US
dc.subjectPolifonieen_US
dc.subjectHeterologieen_US
dc.subjectBegrensde teksen_US
dc.subjectOnbegrensde teksen_US
dc.subjectGrense rondom die teksen_US
dc.subjectIntertextualityen_US
dc.subjectIntratextualityen_US
dc.subjectMetatextualityen_US
dc.subjectHypertextualityen_US
dc.subjectPostmodernism and intertextualityen_US
dc.subjectDeconstruction and intertextualityen_US
dc.subjectInfluence and intertextualityen_US
dc.subjectDialogismen_US
dc.subjectPolyphonyen_US
dc.subjectHeteroglossiaen_US
dc.subjectBounded texten_US
dc.subjectUnbounded texten_US
dc.subjectLimits of the texten_US
dc.titleBegrens én onbegrens : intertekstualiteit in die oeuvre van H.J. Pieterseafr
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record