Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMbao, Melvin Leslie
dc.contributor.authorModibela, Rebecca
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-27T13:19:40Z
dc.date.available2022-10-27T13:19:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9879-3712
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/40037
dc.descriptionLLM (Mercantile Law), North-West University, Mahikeng Campusen_US
dc.description.abstractSection 76 of the Companies Act 2008 provides for fiduciary duties of directors in a company. This section confers very important functions on directors and what is expected of them in exercising their functions and powers as directors. On the other hand, section 77 of the Companies Act 2008 imposes liability on directors of a company who breach their fiduciary duties. The Act also provides company shareholders and other stakeholders with statutory shareholder remedies which protect their rights as shareholders in cases where directors are in breach of duties owed to them and the company. This remedies confer a pivotal function on the courts as gatekeepers, ensuring that shareholder’s rights are protected and liability is imposed on directors. South Africa was ranked the most unequal in the economy in 1994. Black participation was limited and an inferior set of skills restricted access to technological and professional jobs until the advent of democracy. The government adopted the Black Economic Empowerment policy which emerged as one of a myriad initiatives and strategic interventions to redress the imbalances of the past in relation to the distribution of wealth and access to the economy. As a consequence of this empowerment initiative, BEE fronting has emerged as a key challenge to the implementation of the BEE policy. Fronting circumvents empowerment by taking away rightfully deserved opportunities from companies that comply with the B-BBEE scorecards in favour of companies that exploit transformative ideals and manipulate B-BBEE scorecards. This study makes a contribution to knowledge of several aspects, namely, directors’ fiduciary duties and liability thereof; statutory shareholder remedies; BEE policy and BEE fronting and how such remedies could be utilised to combat fronting. Shareholders and other stakeholders use statutory shareholder remedies to combat BEE fronting. The courts and Commission must protect the rights of shareholders and combat BEE fronting by exercising their wide discretion.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University (South Africa).en_US
dc.subjectBlack Economic Empowermenten_US
dc.subjectFrontingen_US
dc.subjectDirectorsen_US
dc.subjectShareholder remediesen_US
dc.subjectDelinquenten_US
dc.subjectOppressiveen_US
dc.subjectDerivativeen_US
dc.titleAn Analysis of the Effectiveness of Shareholder remedies under the Companies Act, 2008 in combating BEE frontingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.researchID12294608 - Mbao, Melvin Leslie (Supervisor)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record