Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNewaj, Kamalesh
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-23T13:15:35Z
dc.date.available2022-02-23T13:15:35Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationNewaj, K. 2020. Defining fairness in dismissals of unauthorised foreign nationals. Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad = Potchefstroom electronic law journal, 2019(22):1-25 [http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727- 3781/2020/v23i0a7586]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/38508
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727- 3781/2020/v23i0a7586
dc.description.abstractIt is trite that if a person's employment is prohibited by law it is not possible for such a person to perform his or her work lawfully. However, people are employed despite failing to comply with statutory requirements. One such class of persons consists of unauthorised foreign nationals. This arises in circumstances where they are employed without work permits or where their work permits expire during employment. The Labour Court in Discovery Health Limited v CCMA 2008 7 BLLR 633 (LC) has affirmed that the absence of a valid work permit does not invalidate the contract of employment, thereby endorsing the fact that unauthorised foreign nationals are regarded as employees. While the Labour Court has confirmed that unauthorised foreign nationals are subject to labour law protection, notably the right not to be unfairly dismissed, it is irrefutable that employers are permitted to dismiss such employees. However, these dismissals must be fair. Unfortunately, there is no clarity on what constitutes a fair dismissal in such circumstances. Although the CCMA relying on the decision of Discovery Health is substantially unanimous in finding that unauthorised foreign nationals have the right to utilise the unfair dismissal machinery sanctioned in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, its decisions are plagued with inconsistency when it comes to determining fairness. Furthermore, no specific guidance has been forthcoming from the Labour Court. Considering the fact that migration to South Africa is rife, resulting in many foreign nationals being employed, this is an important aspect of the law. Therefore, this article explores the substantive and procedural fairness requirements of such dismissals. Having clarity of the legal requirements that apply will aid the fair treatment of foreign nationals who face dismissals due to the absence of valid work permits. This is significant, as South African labour law places a high premium on the fair dismissal of all employees. Apart from being legislated in the LRA, this right is also a constitutional imperative.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPER/PELJen_US
dc.subjectUnauthorised foreign nationalsen_US
dc.subjectUnfair dismissalen_US
dc.subjectDismissal on grounds of operational requirementsen_US
dc.subjectDismissal on grounds of incapacityen_US
dc.subjectDismissal on grounds of misconducten_US
dc.subjectImmigration Acten_US
dc.subjectSubstantive fairnessen_US
dc.subjectProcedural fairnessen_US
dc.titleDefining fairness in dismissals of unauthorised foreign nationalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record