dc.contributor.advisor | Gerber, P.D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cotter, C.A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-14T08:00:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-14T08:00:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-0929 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/37381 | |
dc.description | PhD (Business Management), North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, 2018 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this PhD research study was to measure the strategic impact and value of Learning and Development (L&D) practices. The objectives of the research study were fourfold, namely: #1. To determine the current strategic levels of L&D impact (maturity); #2. To determine the priority factors driving strategic L&D, the current state of L&D readiness to deliver these strategic factors and determine the differential, that is, the capability gap index; #3. To construct an internationally-relevant and multi disciplinary applicable, Strategic Business Management-aligned, Learning and Development measurement tool (Scorecard) and #4. To develop a conceptual framework and business-valued processes to transform and re -position the L&D function to become a strategic learning partner. Using a detailed literature review, ten factors of Strategic L&D were identified . These factors formed the basis for a 175-item questionnaire that was developed, as the primary data collection method, for measuring the strategic impact and value of L&D practices. By means of a comprehensive cross-industry analysis, involving a sample of 463 global respondents, various descriptive and intergroup comparative statistical measures were utilised to measure the current L&D practices. The research study findings revealed below average (low) levels of the strategic impact and value of L&D (maturity and readiness) practices and identified serious shortcomings in the majority of the ten factors of strategic L&D. The researcher computed the Strategic L&D Capability Gap Index, that is, the differential between the perceived
importance and compliance. Despite the apparent drive towards becoming a strategic learning partner, L&D practices still tend to be more transactional (level 2) and not strategic (level 4). Based on the research findings, the researcher developed a 74-item, weighted Strategic Learning and Development Scorecard that organisations can utilise for diagnostic and analytical purposes. This research study concluded by making
recommendations to the effect of strategically re -positioning and enhancing L&D practices, to actualise to become a strategic learning partner. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | North-West University (South Africa) | en_US |
dc.subject | Strategic learning and development | en_US |
dc.subject | Strategic learning partner | en_US |
dc.subject | Learning and development Capability Gap Index | en_US |
dc.subject | Learning and development scorecard | en_US |
dc.title | Transforming learning and development into a strategic, value-adding business solution : a conceptual and business-minded framework | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesistype | Doctoral | en_US |
dc.contributor.researchID | 22338292 - Gerber, Pierre Daniel (Supervisor) | |