• Login
    View Item 
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • North-West University Journals
    • TD The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa
    • TD: 2019 Volume 15
    • View Item
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • North-West University Journals
    • TD The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa
    • TD: 2019 Volume 15
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Consequences of (un)regulated party funding in South Africa between 1994 and 2017

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Maphunye_KJ_Consequences.pdf (510.4Kb)
    Date
    2019
    Author
    Maphunye, Kealeboga J.
    Motubatse, Kgobalale N.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Globally, the topic of political party funding evokes strongly defended positions, partly because of the nasty dynamics that usually arise whenever money and politics cross paths. The primary issue in contention is whether to institute mandatory disclosure legislation, legally compelling parties to reveal their sources of funding, and the likely consequences of such disclosure. Alternatively, a laissez-faire approach may be adopted to party funding, and to determine which parties to exclude from state or public funding. In South Africa, these issues routinely raise public outcry and result in emotive debates pertaining to the expenditure of public finance and accountability. Thus, this article explores contemporary issues on political party funding in South Africa, focusing on recognised parties and examining their sources of funding. This article examines recent media reports on allegations of a lack of accountability on the part of political parties, particularly their apparent reluctance to disclose their sources of funding. It seeks to contribute to the debate on party funding in South Africa, through the use of a qualitative research method using content analysis. The authors contend that officially recognised parties should be audited by a Supreme Audit Institution (the Auditor General South Africa, locally) prior to tabling their annual reports in Parliament. The article concludes that such audit responsibility should not be given to private audit firms in order to avoid possible conflicts of interest, as some audit firms and individual employees may also be funders of some of the political parties.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10394/35409
    https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v15i1.557
    Collections
    • TD: 2019 Volume 15 [22]

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of NWU-IR Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV