Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWright, Caradee Y.
dc.contributor.authorGodfrey, Linda
dc.contributor.authorArmiento, Giovanna
dc.contributor.authorHaywood, Lorren K.
dc.contributor.authorInglesi-Lotz, Roula
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-04T10:08:24Z
dc.date.available2020-03-04T10:08:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationWright, C.Y. et al. 2019. Circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries. Globalization and health, 15(1): #65. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0501-y]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1744-8603 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/34250
dc.identifier.urihttps://globalizationandhealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12992-019-0501-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0501-y
dc.description.abstractBackground The circular economy framework for human production and consumption is an alternative to the traditional, linear concept of ‘take, make, and dispose’. Circular economy (CE) principles comprise of ‘design out waste and pollution’, ‘retain products and materials in use’, and ‘regenerate natural systems’. This commentary considers the risks and opportunities of the CE for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), acknowledging that LMICs must identify their own opportunities, while recognising the potential positive and negative environmental health impacts. Main body The implementation of the CE in LMICs is mostly undertaken informally, driven by poverty and unemployment. Activities being employed towards extracting value from waste in LMICs are imposing environmental health risks including exposure to hazardous and toxic working environments, emissions and materials, and infectious diseases. The CE has the potential to aid towards the achievement of the SDGs, in particular SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities). However, since SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being) is critical in the pursuit of all SDGs, the negative implications of the CE should be well understood and addressed. We call on policy makers, industry, the health sector, and health-determining sectors to address these issues by defining mechanisms to protect vulnerable populations from the negative health impacts that may arise in LMICs as these countries domesticate the CE. Conclusion Striving towards a better understanding of risks should not undermine support for the CE, which requires the full agency of the public and policy communities to realise the potential to accelerate LMICs towards sustainable production and consumption, with positive synergies for several SDGsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.subjectCircular economyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental healthen_US
dc.subjectLow-and-middle-income countriesen_US
dc.subjectSustainable productionen_US
dc.subjectSustainable consumptionen_US
dc.subjectSustainable development goalsen_US
dc.titleCircular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID27256804 - Godfrey, Linda K.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record