Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSiebert, Frances
dc.contributor.authorDreber, Niels
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T07:07:14Z
dc.date.available2019-07-23T07:07:14Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSiebert, F. & Dreber, N. 2019. Forb ecology research in dry African savannas: knowledge, gaps, and future perspectives. Ecology and evolution, 9(13):7875-7891. [https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5307]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-7758 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/32952
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.5307
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5307
dc.description.abstractSavannas are commonly described as a vegetation type with a grass layer interspersed with a discontinuous tree or shrub layer. On the contrary, forbs, a plant life form that can include any nongraminoid herbaceous vascular plant, are poorly represented in definitions of savannas worldwide. While forbs have been acknowledged as a diverse component of the herbaceous layer in savanna ecosystems and valued for the ecosystem services and functions they provide, they have not been the primary focus in most savanna vegetation studies. We performed a systematic review of scientific literature to establish the extent to which forbs are implicitly or explicitly considered as a discrete vegetation component in savanna research. The overall aims were to summarize knowledge on forb ecology, identify knowledge gaps, and derive new perspectives for savanna research and management with a special focus on arid and semiarid ecosystems in Africa. We synthesize and discuss our findings in the context of different overarching research themes: (a) functional organization and spatial patterning, (b) land degradation and range management, (c) conservation and reserve management, (d) resource use and forage patterning, and (e) germination and recruitment. Our results revealed biases in published research with respect to study origin (country coverage in Africa), climate (more semiarid than arid systems), spatial scale (more local than landscape scale), the level at which responses or resource potential was analyzed (primarily plant functional groups rather than species), and the focus on interactions between life forms (rather seldom between forbs and grasses and/or trees). We conclude that the understanding of African savanna community responses to drivers of global environmental change requires knowledge beyond interactions between trees and grasses only and beyond the plant functional group level. Despite multifaceted evidence of our current understanding of forbs in dry savannas, there appear to be knowledge gaps, specifically in linking drivers of environmental change to forb community responses. We therefore propose that more attention be given to forbs as an additional ecologically important plant life form in the conventional tree–grass paradigm of savannasen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectBiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectBiomassen_US
dc.subjectDisturbanceen_US
dc.subjectForageen_US
dc.subjectHerbaceous communityen_US
dc.subjectIndicatoren_US
dc.subjectSemi-ariden_US
dc.titleForb ecology research in dry African savannas: knowledge, gaps, and future perspectivesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID21074968 - Siebert, Frances


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record