Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMara, L., Prof
dc.contributor.advisorLamprecht, A., Dr
dc.contributor.authorOdede, N.L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-11T11:15:24Z
dc.date.available2019-06-11T11:15:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1839-547X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/32757
dc.descriptionMA (Old Testament), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus
dc.description.abstractThe theological debate surrounding the identity of the New Covenant law in Jeremiah 31:33 is persistent and without resolution. Among others, two main views identify Jeremiah’s supposed law as either the Old Testament Mosaic Law (implying continuity) or the New Testament law of Christ in the Christian age (advocating for discontinuity with the old). But barely has any of the debates comprehensively explored the possibility of the reference to “My law" being metaphoric. Much study on the identity of the supposed New Covenant law has mainly been centred on etymology and interpretations drawn from the New Testament’s progressive revelation. But to note, a word derives its meaning from the context it is used. Thus our study attempted to derive the meaning of Jeremiah’s law reference from its near and surrounding context, and to specifically explore the possibility of it constituting a metaphoric rather than a literal term. This study mainly employs the historical-grammatical methodology because of its attested principles which include: divine inspiration, context, lexicography, grammatical analysis and historical-cultural background. The biblical-theological approach to interpreting the Bible is also incorporated given that covenant is one of the central themes in the grand narrative of Scripture — both Old and New Testaments. This study explores the significance and essence of the Mosaic Covenant and its Law within the ANE context; after which the necessity of the New Covenant in light of the existing old one is determined. The essence of the New Covenant (its distinguishing factor from the old) is also analysed. The New Covenant prophecy of Ezekiel, a younger contemporary of Jeremiah, will also be considered in the analysis. Parallel observations from both Jeremiah and Ezekiel will be drawn to help determine the defining factor of the New Covenant prophecy — the promise of heart transformation resulting in a restored relationship with God. This study will explore the concept of heart transformation by the power of the Spirit of God as the essence of both Jeremiah’s and Ezekiel’s New Covenant prophecies, and consider whether the reference to “My law" in Jeremiah 31:33 is a metaphor typifying the anticipated divine heart change, and not necessarily a reference to a literal law code, whether Mosaic or another type of law(s).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West Universityen_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subjectNew Covenant lawen_US
dc.subjectNew Covenanten_US
dc.subjectMosaic Covenanten_US
dc.subjectOld Covenanten_US
dc.subjectMosaic Lawen_US
dc.subjectLaw of Mosesen_US
dc.subjectThe Lawen_US
dc.subjectJeremiah 31:33en_US
dc.subjectEzekiel 36:26-27en_US
dc.subjectDeuteronomy 30:6en_US
dc.subjectSpirit of Goden_US
dc.subjectMetaphoren_US
dc.titleJeremiah 31:33 and the New Covenant Lawen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US
dc.contributor.researchID22685014 - Mara, Leonard (Supervisor)
dc.contributor.researchID12791067 - Lamprecht, Adriaan (Supervisor)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record