Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorVan der Waldt, G.
dc.contributor.authorVan der Merwe, L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-07T13:12:20Z
dc.date.available2019-05-07T13:12:20Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/32313
dc.descriptionPhD (Development and Management), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2018en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study starts with exploring the evolution of thinking regarding organisations as open systems. It provides a perspective on a total systems approach to organisation design and organisation development and identifies high leverage components in systems which enable organisation resilience. It provides a holistic perspective on organisation resilience and sustainable economic growth including the paradigmatic developments, schools of thinking, theoretical principles theories and models for orgainsational resilience. It identifies the anticipation, adaptation and recovery (AAR) framework as starting point within which a diagnostic instrument could be designed and developed. It investigates trends patterns of behaviour and systemic structures that influence resilience, with specific reference to city government, including high leverage areas within the extended AAR meta-framework. Factors and items are components of a diagnostic instrument for gauging and enabling resilience in city government including aspirational descriptors for factors and items in the diagnostic instrument with which to gauge current reality for a city government resilience strategy. The aspirational quality of descriptors provides a perspective on the desired results (vision) for particular aspects and may form the basis for linking factors and items to benchmarks. Capability assessment, capacity-building in cross-cutting competencies, anticipation, adaptation, recovery, sustainable development, green growth and smart cities form the meta-framework of the diagnostic instrument within which items and their descriptors are situated. Triangulation between the literature study, the instrument design, and cross-checking with a purposive sample of users established its validity empirically within a pre-test and post-test framework to develop the final diagnostic instrument for gauging city government resilience. Hierdie studie begin met die ondersoek van die evolusie van denke rakende organisasies as oop stelsels. Dit bied 'n geïntegreerde stelselsbenadering tot organisasie-ontwerp en organisasie-ontwikkeling, en identifiseer hoë-hefboom komponente in stelsels wat organisatoriese veerkragtigheid moontlik maak. Dit bied 'n holistiese perspektief op organisatoriese veerkragtigheid en volhoubare ekonomiese groei, insluitende die paradigmatiese ontwikkelinge, denkskole, teoretiese beginsels, teorieë en modelle vir organisasie veerkragtigheid. Dit identifiseer die verwagting, aanpassing en herstel (VAH), ook genoem die “AAR” raamwerk, wat as ontwerpsbeginpunt vir die ontwikkeling van 'n diagnostiese instrument dien. Dit ondersoek tendense van gedrag- en sistemiese strukture wat veerkragtigheid beïnvloed, met spesifieke verwysing na stadsregering, insluitend hoë-hefboomgebiede binne die uitgebreide AAR meta-raamwerk. Faktore en items word komponente van 'n diagnostiese instrument wat veerkragtigheid meet en dit ook van toepassing op stadsregering maak deur die faktore en items wat in die diagnostiese instrument vervat is. Vaardigheidsaanslag, kapasiteitsbou in kruisvaardighede, afwagting, aanpassing, herstel, volhoubare ontwikkeling, “groen” ontwikkeling en “slim” stede (smart cities) vorm die meta-raamwerk van die diagnostiese instrument waarbinne items en hul aanwysers geleë is. Triangulering van data afkomstig van die literatuurstudie, die instrumentontwerp en ‘n kruiskontrole met 'n doelgerigte steekproef van gebruikers het empiries die instrument se geldigheid vasgestel binne 'n voor-toets- en na-toets-raamwerk om die finale diagnostiese instrument te ontwikkel wat ‘n stadsregering se veerkragtigheid meet.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University (South Africa). Potchefstroom Campusen_US
dc.subjectCapabilityen_US
dc.subjectcapacity buildingen_US
dc.subjectcity governmenten_US
dc.subjectcity government resilienceen_US
dc.subjectorganisation resilienceen_US
dc.subjectsystems thinkingen_US
dc.subjectsystems dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectresilience indicatorsen_US
dc.subjectscenario-based strategyen_US
dc.subjectfuturingen_US
dc.subjectorganisation learningen_US
dc.subjectchange managementen_US
dc.subjectleverageen_US
dc.subjectdevelopmental citiesen_US
dc.subjecturban dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectnetworksen_US
dc.subjectVermoëen_US
dc.subjectkapasiteitsbouen_US
dc.subjectstadsregeringen_US
dc.subjectstad regering veerkragtigheiden_US
dc.subjectorganisasie veerkragtigheiden_US
dc.subjectstelsels denkeen_US
dc.subjectstelsels dinamikaen_US
dc.subjectveerkragtigheid aanwysersen_US
dc.subjectscenario-gebaseerde strategieen_US
dc.subjecttoekomsen_US
dc.subjectorganisasie ontwikkelingen_US
dc.subjectorganisasie leeren_US
dc.subjectveranderingsbestuuren_US
dc.subjecthefboomen_US
dc.subjectontwikkelingstedeen_US
dc.subjectstedelike dinamikaen_US
dc.subjectnetwerkeen_US
dc.titleCity government resilience: Towards a diagnostic instrumenten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeDoctoralen_US
dc.contributor.researchID12330841 - Van der Waldt, Gerrit (Supervisor)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record