Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrinsloo, Barend
dc.contributor.authorVan Niekerk, Dewald
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T09:11:57Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T09:11:57Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationPrinsloo, B. & Van Niekerk, D. 2017. Hybrid peacekeeping and the United Nations: the case of UNAMID. Politikon, 44(3):404-424. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2017.1290862]
dc.identifier.issn0258-9346
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2017.1290862
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/28249
dc.description.abstractThe statutory framework which allows for the United Nations (UN) to conduct peace operations with regional organisations is examined along with the significance and meaning of a hybrid arrangement or agreement. This is followed by an analysis on the effectiveness of such an arrangement through the workings of the United Nations-African Union Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) which is accepted to be the first peacekeeping mission with a unique hybrid character. It is highlighted that the hybrid aspect of UNAMID did not contravene the statutory requirements of the UN but it did aim, albeit unsuccessfully, to stifle the international associated character of the operation. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the operation was hampered by shortcomings in its mandate as a result of its hybrid character. It is nevertheless concluded that the hybrid model was a viable approach under certain conditions, and as such, UNAMID might well have been the pioneering mission which could have changed the UN approach to peacekeeping.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.titleHybrid peacekeeping and the United Nations: the case of UNAMID
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.researchID12261319 - Prinsloo, Barend Louwrens


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record