Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKidgell, Dawson J.
dc.contributor.authorHowatson, Glyn
dc.contributor.authorBonanno, Daniel R.
dc.contributor.authorFrazer, Ashlyn K.
dc.contributor.authorPearce, Alan J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-06T13:47:11Z
dc.date.available2018-06-06T13:47:11Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationKidgell, D.J. et al. 2017. Corticospinal responses following strength training: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. European journal of neuroscience, 46(11):2648-2661. [https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13710]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0953-816X
dc.identifier.issn1460-9568 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/27349
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13710
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ejn.13710
dc.description.abstractStrength training results in changes in skeletal muscle; however, changes in the central nervous system also occur. Over the last 15 years, non‐invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, have been used to study the neural adaptations to strength training. This review explored the hypothesis that the neural adaptations to strength training may be due to changes in corticospinal excitability and inhibition and, such changes, contribute to the gain in strength following strength training. A systematic review, according to PRISMA guidelines, identified studies by database searching, hand‐searching and citation tracking between January 1990 and the first week of February 2017. Methodological quality of included studies was determined using the Downs and Black quality index. Data were synthesised and interpreted from meta‐analysis. Nineteen studies investigating the corticospinal responses following strength training were included. Meta‐analysis found that strength training increased strength [standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.84, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.13], decreased short‐interval intracortical inhibition (SMD −1.00, 95% CI −1.84 to −0.17) and decreased the cortical silent period (SMD −0.66, 95% CI −1.00 to −0.32). Strength training had no effect on motor threshold (SMD −0.12, 95% CI −0.49 to 0.25), but a borderline effect for increased corticospinal excitability (SMD 0.27, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.54). In untrained healthy participants, the corticospinal response to strength training is characterised by reduced intracortical inhibition and cortical silent period duration, rather than changes in corticospinal excitability. These data demonstrate that strength training targets intracortical inhibitory networks within the primary motor cortex (M1) and corticospinal pathway, characterising an important neural adaptation to strength trainingen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectExcitabilityen_US
dc.subjectInhibitionen_US
dc.subjectIntracortical inhibitionen_US
dc.subjectResistance exerciseen_US
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulationen_US
dc.titleCorticospinal responses following strength training: a systematic review and meta‐analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID26084759 - Howatson, Glyn


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record