Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJoseph, Philip
dc.contributor.authorKruger, Annamarie
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Quazi
dc.contributor.authorYusuf, Salim
dc.contributor.authorLee, Shun Fu
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-16T11:50:55Z
dc.date.available2018-04-16T11:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationJoseph, P. et al. 2018. Prognostic validation of a non-laboratory and a laboratory based cardiovascular disease risk score in multiple regions of the world. Heart, 104(7):581-587. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311609]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1355-6037
dc.identifier.issn1468-201X (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/26711
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311609
dc.identifier.urihttp://heart.bmj.com/content/heartjnl/104/7/581.full.pdf
dc.description.abstractO bjective t o evaluate the performance of the non- laboratory i nterheart risk score ( n l - i hrs ) to predict incident cardiovascular disease ( c V D) across seven major geographic regions of the world. t h e secondary objective was to evaluate the performance of the fasting cholesterol- based i hrs (F c - i hrs ) . Methods U sing measures of discrimination and calibration, we tested the performance of the n l - i hrs (n=100 4 75) and F c - i hrs (n=107 8 63) for predicting incident c V D in a community-based, prospective study across seven geographic regions: s o uth a s ia, c h ina, s o utheast a s ia, Middle e a st, e u rope/ n o rth a m erica, s o uth a m erica and a f rica. c V D was defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or coronary revascularisation. r e sults M ean age of the study population was 50.53 ( s D 9.79) years and mean follow-up was 4.89 ( s D 2.24) years. t h e n l - i hrs had moderate to good discrimination for incident c V D across geographic regions (concordance statistic ( c - statistic) ranging from 0.64 to 0.74), although recalibration was necessary in all regions, which improved its performance in the overall cohort (increase in c - statistic from 0.69 to 0.72, p<0.001). r e gional recalibration was also necessary for the F c - i hrs , which also improved its overall discrimination (increase in c - statistic from 0.71 to 0.74, p<0.001). i n 85 0 78 participants with complete data for both scores, discrimination was only modestly better with the F c - i hrs compared with the n l - i hrs (0.74 vs 0.73, p<0.001). Conclusions e x ternal validations of the n l - i hrs and F c - i hrs suggest that regionally recalibrated versions of both can be useful for estimating c V D risk across a diverse range of community-based populations. c V D prediction using a non-laboratory score can provide similar accuracy to laboratory-based methodsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.titlePrognostic validation of a non-laboratory and a laboratory based cardiovascular disease risk score in multiple regions of the worlden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID10062416 - Kruger, Annamarie


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record