Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOuweneel, Piet
dc.contributor.authorVeenhoven, Ruut
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-16T12:57:41Z
dc.date.available2017-05-16T12:57:41Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationOuweneel, P. & Veenhoven, R. 2016. Happy protest voters: the case of Rotterdam 1997-2009. Social Indicators Research, 126:739-756. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0920-y]
dc.identifier.issn0303-8300
dc.identifier.issn1573-0921 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0920-y
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/24654
dc.description.abstractProtest parties are on the rise in several European countries. This development is commonly attributed to a growing dissatisfaction with life and associated with declining quality of life in modern society of the lowest social strata. This explanation is tested in a cross-sectional analysis of voting and life-satisfaction in 63 districts of the city of Rotterdam in the Netherlands, where the share of protest voters increased from 10 % in 1994 to 31 % in 2009. Contrary to this explanation protest voting appeared not to be the most frequent in the least happy districts of Rotterdam, but in the medium happy segment. Also divergent from this explanation was that average happiness in city districts is largely independent of local living conditions, but is rather a matter of personal vulnerability in terms of education, income and health. These results fit alternative explanations in terms of middle class status anxiety.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.subjectPolitical protest
dc.subjectHappiness
dc.subjectLivability of local environment
dc.titleHappy protest voters: the case of Rotterdam 1997-2009
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.researchID23422122 - Veenhoven, Ruut


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record