Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTshehla, B.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-16T09:58:39Z
dc.date.available2017-05-16T09:58:39Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationTshehla, B. 2016. Engagement of prosecutors not in the employ of the National Prosecuting Authority. Journal for juridical science, 41(1):44-64. [http://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC190481]
dc.identifier.issn0258–252X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/24475
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC190481
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.co.za/content/juridic/41/1/EJC190481
dc.description.abstractThis article focuses on the engagement of prosecutors not in the employ of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to prosecute certain cases. Such prosecutors are appointed in terms of section 38 of the National Prosecuting Authority Act 32 of 1998. The article starts by presenting a number of recent court decisions that dealt with the application of this section and contextualises the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in Moussa v S. Given that it was in Moussa that the constitutionality of the section was challenged, the approach of the SCA and the reasons for its decision are discussed. It is submitted that the SCA's decision is a welcome step, in that the court has pronounced itself definitively on the constitutionality of the section and also outlined the approach to be used in determining which appointments of prosecutors, in terms of the section, are acceptable and which are not. In particular, the article explains the test to be used in making that decision.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of the Free State
dc.titleEngagement of prosecutors not in the employ of the National Prosecuting Authority
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.researchID23983868 - Tshehla, Boyane John


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record