Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEiselen, Sieg
dc.contributor.authorChitimira, Howard
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-16T09:58:38Z
dc.date.available2017-05-16T09:58:38Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationEiselen, S. & Chitimira, H. 2016. The requirements for adequate security in Lieu of an enrichment Lien. Journal of Contemporary Roman Dutch Law, 79:652-660. [https://ssrn.com/abstract=2971374]
dc.identifier.issn1682-4490
dc.identifier.urihttps://ssrn.com/abstract=2971374
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/24470
dc.description.abstractPheiffer v Van Wyk 2015 5 SA 464 (SCA) is a key decision in the South African enrichment law because it satisfactorily and authoritatively deals with the following problematic lien-related aspects: (a) whether a third party can furnish security on behalf of the original owner against the lien holder's or affected party's enrichment or improvement lien claim; (b) whether a court can exercise its discretion by ordering a third party who is not the owner of property to furnish security instead of upholding the impoverished party's improvement lien; (c) whether security rendered by a third party is inadequate and meaningless simply because it was furnished by that third party and not the owner; and (d) whether a court can only exercise its discretion to deprive the lien holder of possession in debtor-creditor lien cases, but not in enrichment cases.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectEnrichmentLien
dc.subjectSecurity
dc.subjectEnrichment Lien
dc.subjectImprovement Lien
dc.subjectDebtor-Creditor Lien
dc.titleThe requirements for adequate security in Lieu of an enrichment Lien
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.researchID25319655 - Chitimira, Howard


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record