• Login
    View Item 
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • Research Output
    • Faculty of Law
    • View Item
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • Research Output
    • Faculty of Law
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Are the rights of business employees preferred more than the rights of comestic employees?

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    2016Are_rights.pdf (83.63Kb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Chitimira, Howard
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This case note examines, inter alia, the effect of a sequestration order on the debtor and relevant stakeholders such as creditors, shareholders and other interested parties (see s 20 read with s 9, 10, 11, 12, 17, 19, 21, 23, 37 and 38 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 (hereinafter "the Insolvency Act"). The case note further discusses certain requirements for the application of a sequestration order in South Africa (s 9, read with s 10-12 of the Insolvency Act) in light of the judgment in Gungudoo v Hannover Reinsurance Group Africa ((585/11) [2012] ZASCA 83 (30 May 2012) (hereinafter "Gungudoo case"). This case raised some pertinent questions regarding the application and serving of a sequestration order on the debtor, in terms of the Insolvency Act (s 9(4A), 11(2A) and 11(4)).
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC197438
    http://hdl.handle.net/10394/24469
    Collections
    • Faculty of Law [388]

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of NWU-IR Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV