The rigour versus relevance debate: the Information systems research challenges

Abstract

Rigour and relevance in research division debate is as a result of many reasons. The gap between the two has promoted debate and argument that has lasted for years. Many academics believed that Information Systems (IS) research is effective and others opposed the argument. Others within or outside the discipline are considering whether IS research output is affecting and impacting decision making in the industry. Meanwhile, the debate on rigour and relevance has lasted for decades. In reality, the debate and the gap still persist, in spite of efforts by researchers. Their efforts and hard-work seems ineffective. This study determined whether the needs of practitioners are achieved through rigour and relevance of IS/academic research. It also determined whether this debate over these decades has been worth from an academic viewpoint. There is also an on-going criticism that IS research lacks rigour, relevance, effective communication and acceptance in the field as discovered during the data discussion. But the reality shows that IS research output is challenges. This study applied quantitative research method through the use of questionnaire as the research instrument.