Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMfuti, David K.
dc.contributor.authorDu Plessis, Hannalene
dc.contributor.authorNiassy, Saliou
dc.contributor.authorSubramanian, Sevgan
dc.contributor.authorEkesi, Sunday
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-03T07:58:13Z
dc.date.available2017-05-03T07:58:13Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationMfuti, D.K. et al. 2017. Lure and infect strategy for application of entomopathogenic fungus for the control of bean flower thrips in cowpea. Biological control, 107:70-76. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.01.011]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-9644
dc.identifier.issn1090-2112 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/21641
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964417300117
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.01.011
dc.description.abstractThe efficacy of spot spray and cover spray applications of Metarhizium anisopliae (Metsch.) Sorok. in combination with the thrips attractant Lurem-TR (methyl-isonicotinate) was compared in field experiments for the management of bean flower thrips (BFT), Megalurothrips sjostedti (Trybom), on a cowpea crop in two seasons (June-December 2014). Treatments were applied five days after the placement of Lurem-TR in the field. During the first season, BFT densities per plant 5 days post-application were lower in spot spray (10.1 ± 4.3) and cover spray (11.5 ± 4.8) treatments than in the control treatment (41.8 ± 15.2). In the second season, 5 days post-application, the spot spray treatment recorded the lowest BFT density of 32.5 ± 6.0, followed by cover spray with 40.9 ± 7.0 thrips. The control treatment recorded the highest BFT density of 67.4 ± 10.3 5 days post-application. Conidial viability and thrips conidial acquisition did not differ between the two application methods. Grain yields of 1430.7 ± 114.2 kg and 1312.1 ± 87.7 kg were obtained in the cover and spot spray treatments, respectively, while 976.8 ± 105.2 kg in the control during the second season. The cost benefit analysis indicated profits with the spot spray than cover spray application due to the reduction in labor and the quantity of inoculum used. Spot spray application of biopesticides could therefore be a viable option for small-scale farmers for the management of BFT on cowpeaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCost benefiten_US
dc.subjectLurem-TRen_US
dc.subjectLure and infecten_US
dc.subjectMetarhizium anisopliaeen_US
dc.subjectMegalurothrips sjostedtien_US
dc.titleLure and infect strategy for application of entomopathogenic fungus for the control of bean flower thrips in cowpeaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID11234970 - Du Plessis, Magdalena Johanna


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record