Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorViegas, Cláudia V.
dc.contributor.authorBond, Alan, J.
dc.contributor.authorVaz, Caroline R.
dc.contributor.authorBorchardt, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Giancarlo Medeiros
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T09:05:03Z
dc.date.available2017-04-24T09:05:03Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationViegas, C.V. et al. 2016. Critical attributes of sustainability in higher education: a categorisation from literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 126:260-276. [http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-cleaner-production/]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.issn1879-1786 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/21539
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.106
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965261630018X
dc.description.abstractSustainability in Higher Education has been investigated mainly through examining institutional approaches, curricula content, or students' and teachers' perceptions of sustainability in practice. However, a deep characterisation of the foundations of this phenomenon is lacking. This article aims to address the existing lack of depth and comprehensiveness by identifying and categorising the critical attributes of Sustainability in Higher Education. Categories are the basic levels for knowledge classification, and critical attributes relate to the main perceived characteristics within categories. Both were structured through a literature review and a systematic analysis using the Proknow-C method. A set of 2513 studies on sustainability in education and related fields, published between 2000 and 2015, enabled the identification of 259 as appropriate for devising four categories: foundations, knowledge, personal, and integrative assets with 4, 4, 4, and 3 attributes respectively. From these, 129 papers presented at least four relationships among attributes of all categories. An assessment between the attributes identified for the selected studies delivered 85 analyses, with the following findings: (i) epistemologies of Sustainability in Higher Education develop in learning context; (ii) creativity should better link foundational and personal assets; (iii) transdisciplinarity is an epistemic transgression; (iv) resilience of active learners emerges in knowledge and personal assets relationships; (v) knowledge deconstruction and affectiveness form active learning; (vi) personal assets need to fit to complex dynamics of reality. Our analysis provides a means of benchmarking existing practice for Sustainability in Higher Education, and can be used as the basis for building capacity in a systematic wayen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectSustainability in higher educationen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectEpistemologyen_US
dc.subjectInterdisciplinarityen_US
dc.subjectTransdisciplinarityen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.titleCritical attributes of sustainability in higher education: a categorisation from literature reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID23920084 - Bond, Alan James


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record