dc.contributor.author | Louw, Henk | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-27T09:45:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-27T09:45:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Louw, H. 2015. Marking for structure using Boolean feedback. Journal for language teaching (Saalt Journal For Language Teaching), 49(1):307–331. [http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v49i1.12] | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0259–9570 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/20574 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v49i1.12 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents evidence that
marking student texts with wellconsidered
checklists is more effective
than marking by hand. An experiment
conducted on first-year students
illustrated that the checklists developed
to mark introductions, conclusions and
paragraphs yielded better revision
results than handwritten comments.
Additional benefits made possible by
the technique make a strong case
for the use of such a technique in the
marking of student texts. The marks
assigned to the student texts also make
a strong case for focusing on these
specific textual features. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | South African Association for Language Teaching (SAALT) | en_US |
dc.subject | Feedback | en_US |
dc.subject | Second Language Writing | en_US |
dc.subject | Checklist feedback | en_US |
dc.subject | Text structure | en_US |
dc.subject | Cohesion | en_US |
dc.title | Marking for structure using Boolean feedback | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.contributor.researchID | 12130478 - Louw, Henk | |