Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDu Toit, Pieter
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-27T12:27:54Z
dc.date.available2016-07-27T12:27:54Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationDu Toit, P. 2016. Publisiteitsbevele as vonnisopsie vir regspersone - publicity orders as sentencing option for juristic persons. Potchefstroom electronic law journal (PELJ) = Potchefstroomse elektoniese regsblad (PER), 19(1):2-18 [http://www.nwu.ac.za/p-per/index.html]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/18084
dc.description.abstractThis contribution addresses the issue of adverse publicity orders as a possible supplementary sentencing option for corporate offenders. In South Africa fines are the primary sentencing option available to courts when imposing sentences on juristic persons. Fines, however, do not adequately serve the purposes of corporate sentencing. Publicity orders require the publication of an offender�s conviction, sentence and the details of the offence to individuals or a group of persons (such as shareholders). An adverse publication damages the corporate offender�s reputation � a valuable asset to a corporate entity. It therefore serves the purpose of corporate deterrence. In this contribution criticism is levelled against the fine as primary sentencing option for juristic persons; the notion of corporate reputation is considered from a social and legal perspective; a functional comparative study of adverse publication orders is presented and recommendations are made regarding the content of effective publication orders.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCorporationsen_US
dc.subjectJuristic personsen_US
dc.subjectPublicity ordersen_US
dc.subjectCorporate sentencingen_US
dc.titlePublisiteitsbevele as vonnisopsie vir regspersone - publicity orders as sentencing option for juristic personsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record