Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSmit, M.H.
dc.contributor.advisorRossouw, J.P.
dc.contributor.authorMans, Christina Susanna
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-16T08:41:09Z
dc.date.available2016-02-16T08:41:09Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/16304
dc.descriptionMEd (Education Law), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2015en_US
dc.description.abstractProtective, as well as punitive legal measures applicable to education, are embedded in various acts. Despite these legal measures, incidences of educator misconduct occur at schools and often go unpunished. The implied situation, namely that the legal measures are not applied correctly, as well as the effect that educator misconduct has on educator security, is a cause for concern. This study is embedded in Education Law as the subject area and aimed to determine the effect of educator misconduct on educator security. Factors contributing to the phenomenon of non-punishment of educator misconduct were also investigated and determined. By utilising a qualitative research design and participants from a specific geographical area, a variety of findings have been made. The most important finding is that particular instances of educator misconduct has a detrimental effect on educator security which manifests on the physical as well as psychological levels of the participants in this study. Educator misconduct not only impacts educator security, but may also lead to a dysfunctional equilibrium, rendering schools ineffective. Some reasons for not applying legal measures include an unacceptably low standard of legal knowledge among employees, union involvement, ubuntu and the tribal hierarchy system. These reasons have, however, been found to be perfunctory. The deep-seated reason can be attributed to the quest for modernisation. Not all societies have fully modernised and rural societies, in particular, are still trapped in a transition period. The expectancy levels for service delivery and professionalism in these societies are low, thus contributing to educators‟ misconduct and unprofessional behaviour.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectEducation Lawen_US
dc.subjectLegal determinantsen_US
dc.subjectApplication of legal measuresen_US
dc.subjectTribal hierarchyen_US
dc.subjectEducator misconducten_US
dc.subjectUnionen_US
dc.subjectEducator securityen_US
dc.subjectModernisationen_US
dc.subjectDysfunctional equilibriumen_US
dc.subjectProfessionalismen_US
dc.subjectIntegrated Quality Management Systemen_US
dc.subjectAnnual National Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectOnderwysregen_US
dc.subjectRegsdeterminanteen_US
dc.subjectToepassing van regsmaatreëlsen_US
dc.subjectStamhiërargie-stelselen_US
dc.subjectOpvoederwangedragen_US
dc.subjectVakbonden_US
dc.subjectOpvoedersekuriteiten_US
dc.subjectModerniseringen_US
dc.subjectDisfunksionele ekwilibriumen_US
dc.subjectProfessionalismeen_US
dc.subjectGeïntegreerde kwaliteitsbeheerstelselen_US
dc.subjectNasionale jaarlikse assesseringen_US
dc.titleAn Education Law perspective on educator misconduct and educator securityen
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record