Optimisation of deep burn incineration of reactor waste plutonium ina PBMR DPP-400 core
Date
2014Author
Serfontein, Dawid E.
Mulder, Eben J.
Reitsma, Frederik
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In this article an original set of coupled neutronics and thermo-hydraulic simulation results for the VSOP 99/05 diffusion code are presented for advanced fuel cycles for the incineration of weapons-grade plutonium, reactor-grade plutonium and reactor-grade plutonium with its associated Minor Actinides in the 400 MWth Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Demonstration Power Plant. These results are also compared to those of the standard 9.6 wt% enriched 9 g/fuel sphere U/Pu fuel cycle. The weapons-grade and reactor-grade plutonium fuel cycles produced good burn-ups. However, the addition of the Minor Actinides to the reactor-grade plutonium caused a large decrease in the burn-up and thus an unacceptable increase in the heavy metal (HM) content in the spent fuel, which was intended for direct disposal in a deep geological repository, without chemical reprocessing. All the plutonium fuel cycles failed the adopted safety limits used in the PBMR400 in that either the maximum fuel temperature of 1130 °C during normal operation, or the maximum power density of 4.5 kW/sphere was exceeded. All the plutonium fuel cycles also produced positive uniform temperature reactivity coefficients, i.e. the reactivity coefficient where the temperatures of the fuel and the graphite moderator in the fuel spheres were varied together. These unacceptable positive coefficients were experienced at low temperatures, typically below 700 °C. This was due to the influence of the thermal fission cross-section resonances of 239Pu and 241Pu. Weapons-grade plutonium produced the worst safety performance. The safety performance of the reactor-grade plutonium also deteriorated when the HM loading was reduced from 3 g/sphere to 2 g or 1 g.
In view of these safety problems, these plutonium fuel cycles were judged to be not licensable in the PBMR DPP-400 reactor. Therefore a redesign of the fuel cycle for reactor-grade plutonium, the power conversion system and the reactor geometry is proposed, in order to resolve these safety issues
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10394/16222https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549313006018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.11.017
Collections
- Faculty of Engineering [1136]