Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJonker, A.S.
dc.contributor.authorBosman, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorMathews, E.H.
dc.contributor.authorLiebenberg, L.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-05T06:33:53Z
dc.date.available2016-02-05T06:33:53Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationJonker, A.S. et al. 2014. Flow over a glider canopy. Aeronautical journal, 118 (1204): 669-682. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000009428]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-9240
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/16172
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/aeronautical-journal/article/flow-over-a-glider-canopy/DBB0427ABC6DEE6BBD0743EBC74100B2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000009428
dc.description.abstractIn order to minimise drag, the front part of most modern glider fuselages is shaped so that laminar flow is preserved to a position close to the wing-to-fuselage junction. Experimental investigations on a full-scale JS1 competition glider however revealed that the laminar boundary layer in fact trips to turbulent flow at the fuselage-to-canopy junction position, increasing drag. This is possibly due to ventilation air leaking from the cockpit to the fuselage surface through the canopy seal, or that the gap is merely too large and therefore trips the boundary layer to turbulent flow. The effect of air leaking from the fuselage-to-canopy gap as well as the size of the gap was thus investigated with the use of computational fluid dynamics. It was found that if air was leaking through this gap the boundary layer would be tripped from laminar to turbulent flow. It was also found that the width of the canopy-to-fuselage gap plays a significant role in the preservation of laminar flow. If the gap is less than 1mm wide, the attached boundary layer is able to negotiate the gap without being tripped to turbulent flow, while if the gap is 3mm and wider, it will be tripped from laminar to turbulent flow. The work shows that aerodynamic drag on a glider can be significantly minimised by completely sealing the fuselage-to-canopy gap and by ensuring a seal gap-width of less than 1mm - See more at: http://aerosociety.com/News/Publications/Aero-Journal/Online/2276/Flow-over-a-glider-canopy#sthash.y0Cu5Yn5.dpufen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoyal Aeronautical Societyen_US
dc.titleFlow over a glider canopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID10080570 - Jonker, Adriaan Stefanus
dc.contributor.researchID10855165 - Bosman, Johannes Jacobus
dc.contributor.researchID10477438 - Mathews, Edward Henry
dc.contributor.researchID12850071 - Liebenberg, Leon


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record