Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJosipovic, Micky
dc.contributor.authorBurger, Roelof P.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Anne M.
dc.contributor.authorBeukes, Johan P.
dc.contributor.authorVan Zyl, Pieter G.
dc.contributor.authorVenter, Andrew D.
dc.contributor.authorJaars, Kerneels
dc.contributor.authorLaakso, Lauri
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-27T06:00:00Z
dc.date.available2016-01-27T06:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationJosipovic, M. et al. 2014. A comparison of surface NO2 mixing ratios and total column observations at a South African site. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of South African Society for Atmospheric Sciences. 1-2 Oct 2014, Potchefstroom, South Africa: 29-32. [http://atmres.ukzn.ac.za/SASAS%202014%20peer%20review%20conference%20proceeding.pdf]en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-620-62777-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/16045
dc.identifier.urihttp://atmres.ukzn.ac.za/SASAS%202014%20peer%20review%20conference%20proceeding.pdf
dc.description.abstractThe total column density nitrogen dioxide (NO2) retrievals collated by a ground-based sun-tracking spectrometer (Pandora/GSFC) and the satellite-borne (Aura) Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) were compared to the volume mixing ratios measured by a ground-based gas-analyser at Welgegund, North-West University (NWU) atmospheric monitoring station (Potchefstroom, South Africa). An assessment of the comparability between columnar and surface NO2 measurements was performed. The concurrent ground measurements results over January-March, 2011, were averaged over one hour to correspond to the closest local OMI overpasses (~12:00 UTC). A novel method for estimating surface mixing ratios from total-column retrievals, via a planetary boundary layer (PBL) height correction factor as tested by Knepp et al. (2013) in the USA was applied. This PBL correction factor largely corrects for boundary-layer variability throughout the day, and allows conversion into mixing ratios. The data for the ground instruments were in agreement within the expected uncertainty for each technique and between two remote sensing instruments. However, NO2 between the ground gas analyser and satellite borne instrument were out of the expected uncertainty limits.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSASASen_US
dc.subjectNO2en_US
dc.subjectgas analyseren_US
dc.subjectground-based spectrometeren_US
dc.subjectboundary layeren_US
dc.subjecttotal column densityen_US
dc.subjectvolume mixing ratioen_US
dc.titleA comparison of surface NO2 mixing ratios and total column observations at a South African siteen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.contributor.researchID24062219 - Burger, Roelof Petrus
dc.contributor.researchID24071439 - Thompson, Anne Mee
dc.contributor.researchID10092390 - Beukes, Johan Paul
dc.contributor.researchID10710361 - Van Zyl, Pieter Gideon
dc.contributor.researchID20162750 - Jaars, Kerneels
dc.contributor.researchID22648143 - Josipovic, Miroslav
dc.contributor.researchID20049544 - Venter, Andrew Derick
dc.contributor.researchID21795827 - Laakso, Lauri


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record