Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKloppers, H.J.
dc.contributor.authorSiecker, Jodi
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-05T07:19:01Z
dc.date.available2015-12-05T07:19:01Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/15549
dc.descriptionLLM (Estate Law), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2015en_US
dc.description.abstractThis research report is focused on the limitations placed on the freedom of testation of a person in the broader sense. The principle of freedom of testation is the foundation of the South African testate succession. The South African concept of freedom of testation is currently of such a nature that it allows a testator to bequeath his or her assets according to his or her discretion, subject to some statutory and common law exceptions. In determining whether a particular clause can be contained in a will, such clause shall first be tested against the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, to determine whether such a clause is a possible infringement on a constitutionally entrenched right. Further statutory limitations include the right to dispose of immovable property as regulated by the Immovable Property (Removal or Modification of Restrictions) Act, the right of a minor child to claim maintenance from the estate, the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act and the Pension Funds Act. Freedom of testation is directly linked to every person’s fundamental rights which are guaranteed in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. The principle of freedom of testation has been addressed in several court cases and these court cases are subsequently discussed. The type of matrimonial property regime under which a marriage is concluded is a further restriction on the extent to which a testator can freely dispose of his or her assets. The influence of marriages concluded in or out of community of property on freedom of testation, the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act as well as the maintenance obligation that arises from the marriage between spouses and in respect of their minor children will be analysed. Social security is organised in terms of section 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa and incorporates section 37C of the Pension Funds Act to ensure that a person’s pension benefits must be awarded to the financial dependants of the member to provide for their maintenance needs. The operation and the influence of section 37C and its influence on freedom of testation are discussed. The last limitation which is handled is the limitations that exist in respect of bequests of immovable property. These endowments are limited by the operation of the viii Immovable Property (Removal or Modification of Restrictions) Act and the Subdivision of Agricultural Land Act. This research report therefore does an in-depth research investigation into the limitations that arise on freedom of testation, the relevance and effectiveness thereof and it is determined whether these restrictions may be considered as reasonable or not.en_US
dc.language.isootheren_US
dc.subjectGelykheidsklousuleen_US
dc.subjectGrondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika, 1996en_US
dc.subjectHandves van Regteen_US
dc.subjectHuweliksgoederebedelingsen_US
dc.subjectHuweliksgoederewet 88 van 1984en_US
dc.subjectLangslewende gadeen_US
dc.subjectMinderjarige kindersen_US
dc.subjectOnbillike diskriminasieen_US
dc.subjectOnderhouden_US
dc.subjectTestamenten_US
dc.subjectTestateuren_US
dc.subjectTesteervryheiden_US
dc.subjectWet op die Opheffing of Wysiging van Beperkinge op Onroerende Goed 94 van 1965en_US
dc.subjectWet op Onderhoud 99 van 1998en_US
dc.subjectWet op Onderhoud van Langslewende Gades 27 van 1990en_US
dc.subjectWet op Onderverdeling van Landbougrond 70 van 1970en_US
dc.subjectWet op Pensioenfondse 24 van 1956en_US
dc.titleBeperkings op testeervryheidafr
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record