Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDu Toit, Stephan
dc.contributor.authorDu Toit, Gawie
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-26T09:32:39Z
dc.date.available2014-02-26T09:32:39Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationDu Toit, S. & Du Toit, G. 2013. Learner metacognition and mathematics achievement during problem-solving in a mathematics classroom. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 9(3):505-518, Dec. [http://dspace.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/3605]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1817-4434
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/10143
dc.description.abstractIn this investigation the level of learner metacognition as well as the level of mathematics achievement during problem-solving in a mathematics classroom was investigated. Learner metacognition plays a pivotal role during the problem-solving process and when the problem-solving is successful it can be viewed as evidence of high achievement in mathematics. Data were collected from one intact Grade 11 class of 25 girls. A word problem was given to the learners to solve individually. The learners recorded their thoughts relating to the problem as well as the calculations that corresponded to their thoughts. The level of achievement of the learners were analysed by noting calculation and conceptual errors in the solving of the problem. The learners’ level of metacognition was determined by analysing the written account of their thoughts and comparing it to the items on an adapted Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI). Strong evidence was obtained from the recorded thoughts of learners that their metacognitive behaviours corresponded to the first three phases of Polya’s problem-solving model, but there was no evidence of metacognitive behaviours that corresponded with Polya’s fourth phase (Looking back) of problem-solving. It was further determined that the learners’ metacognitive awareness during the problem-solving session did not relate to the subscale Evaluation of the MAI. It was thus evident that the learners were not reflecting on the validity and correctness of their own solution. In this study a qualitative onephase approach was used to examine the process of intervention, as well as a two-phase approach on the qualitative data which was also embedded in the quantitative methodology prior to and after the intervention phase (two-phase approach).en_US
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.4102/td.v9i3.194
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMetacognitionen_US
dc.subjectSelf-regulated learningen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectMathematics achievementen_US
dc.subjectMathematicsen_US
dc.subjectProblem-solvingen_US
dc.titleLearner metacognition and mathematics achievement during problem-solving in a mathematics classroomen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record