Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLoubser, Ananka
dc.contributor.authorSchuman, Simoné
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-16T08:03:14Z
dc.date.available2018-02-16T08:03:14Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/26355
dc.descriptionMDM, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2017en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study argues that religious beliefs significantly influence a community’s understanding and experience of climate change adaptation, indicating the need for an inclusion of such information in endeavours promoting climate change adaptation. Data were collected using the Q-method, whereby recurring statements were identified from semi-structured interviews in Phase One of the research project with participants from three rural communities in the North West Province of South Africa: Ikageng, Ventersdorp, and Jouberton. During Phase Two, participants were requested to indicate the extent to which they agreed with the Q-statements by taking a Likert scale assessment; this was done allowing a free distribution of responses. In Phase Three the process was repeated, although a forced distribution method was employed that required participants to place only a certain amount of statements under each column. Finally, in Phase Four participant responses were sorted based on their recurrence so as to construct clear narratives that represent differing participant worldviews (Factors: 1-Collectivist/Liberal, 2- Religious Fatalist/Determinist, 3- Religious, 4- Technological/Human, and 5- Governance/Structural). Conclusions indicate that community members who regard themselves as religious (overall of the Christian faith) fall under two groups: the religious determinists or fatalists who relate to Factor Two and see climate as a natural process that is governed by God (removing it from the realm of human influence, and therefore denying the anthropogenic nature of climate change), and religious participants loading significantly for Factor Three, who deny this “naturalness” and acknowledge human impacts on the climate. Both groups, however, indicated an overall willingness to change their beliefs if necessary. For the Factor Two group these changes will be based on a “seeing is believing” principle, encouraging the use of practical examples, and the group identifying with Factor Three requires intrinsic motivation in order to affect change, and the use of conceptual change literature is recommended when attempting any such changes of this group’s beliefsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University (South Africa) , Potchefstroom Campusen_US
dc.subjectAdaptationen_US
dc.subjectAfrican traditional religionsen_US
dc.subjectBeliefsen_US
dc.subjectClimate beliefsen_US
dc.subjectClimate changeen_US
dc.subjectQ-methodologyen_US
dc.subjectReligious beliefsen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.titleThe influence of fundamental beliefs on a community's understanding and experience of climate change adaptationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record