dc.contributor.advisor | Stoffels, Mr. M.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zimani, Sandra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-13T13:29:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-13T13:29:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/26322 | |
dc.description | LLM, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2017 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The principle of collective bargaining may be regarded as one of the major institutions
of employment relationships as it plays a pivotal role in regulating and restoring the
employment relationship between the employer and the employee. The right to strike is
of importance and is central to collective bargaining as without the right to strike
collective bargaining would not be effective. South African collective bargaining is
characterized by an adversarial nature which means that parties "haggle and wrangle"
in wanting their demands met. Several factors which range from historical facts to
legislation contribute towards collective bargaining being adversarial. These adversarial
aspects have caused many to question the place of this type of negotiation in today's
world of globalisation. It is argued that the current adversarial collective bargaining is
no longer compatible with today's corporate world, which seeks dialogue between
employees and employers. The unrest that the labour industry has witnessed in the
past few years can be attributed to the failure of adversarial bargaining to resolve
disputes amicably which is in line with the objectives of the LRA. Adversarial collective
bargaining presents several challenges that have varying implications which need to be
addressed.
Die beginsel van gesamentlike bedinging kan dalk gesien word as een van die
hoofinstellings van werknemingsverhoudinge aangesien dit ‘n sleutelrol speel in
die regulering en herstel van die werkverhouding tussen die werkgewer en die
werknemer. Die reg om te staak is belangrik en sentraal tot gesamentlike
bedinging aangesien gesamentike bedinging nie effektief sal wees as die reg tot
staking nie bestaan nie.
Suid-Afrikaanse gesamentlike bedinging word gekenmerk deur ‘n vyandige aard, wat
beteken dat beide partye stry en baklei om hulle doelwitte te bereik.Verskeie faktore,
wat wissel van historiese feite tot wetgewing, dra by tot die vyandige aard van
gesamentlike bedinging.
Hierdie vyandige aspekte het daartoe gelei dat baie mense vrae vra oor die plek van
hierdie soort onderhandeling in vandag se globaliserende wêreld. Daar word aangevoer
dat die huidige vyandige gesamentlike bedinging nie meer in pas is met vandag se
korporatiewe wêreld wat dialoog tussen werknemers en werkgewers nastreef nie. Die
onrus wat die arbeidsindustrie in die laaste paar jaar gesien het kan toegeskryf word
aan die onvermoë van vyandige bedinging om dispute op te los op ‘n vriendskaplike
wyse wat in lyn is met die doelwitte van die LRA. Vyandige gesamentlike bedinging bied
verskeie uitdagings wat uiteenlopende implikasies het en wat aandag verg. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | North-West University (South Africa), Potchefstroom Campus | en_US |
dc.subject | Adversarial | en_US |
dc.subject | Adversarialism | en_US |
dc.subject | Collective bargaining | en_US |
dc.subject | Negotiation | en_US |
dc.subject | Unrest | en_US |
dc.subject | Implications | en_US |
dc.subject | Strikes | en_US |
dc.subject | Challenges | en_US |
dc.subject | Disputes | en_US |
dc.subject | Trade unions | en_US |
dc.subject | Vyandig | en_US |
dc.subject | Vyandigheid | en_US |
dc.subject | Gesamentlike bedinging | en_US |
dc.subject | Onderhandeling | en_US |
dc.subject | Onrus | en_US |
dc.subject | Implikasies | en_US |
dc.subject | Stakings | en_US |
dc.subject | Uitdagings | en_US |
dc.subject | Dispute | en_US |
dc.subject | Vakbonde | en_US |
dc.title | A legal analysis of the adversarial nature of collective bargaining | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesistype | Masters | en_US |
dc.contributor.researchID | 21424446 - Stoffels, Myrone Christopher (Supervisor) | |