Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, Thomas W.
dc.contributor.authorHowatson, Glyn
dc.contributor.authorWalshe, Ian H.
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, David L.
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-15T08:23:15Z
dc.date.available2017-05-15T08:23:15Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationJones, T.W. et al. 2016. Signaling responses after varying sequencing of strength and endurance training in a fed state. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 11:868-875. [https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2015-0534]
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.issn1555-0273 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/23399
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2015-0534
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare anabolic signaling responses to differing sequences of concurrent strength and endurance training in a fed state. Methods: Eighteen resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to the following experimental conditions: strength training (ST), strength followed by endurance training (ST-END), or endurance followed by strength training (END-ST). Muscle tissue samples were taken from the vastus lateralis before each exercise protocol, on cessation of exercise, and 1 h after cessation of strength training. Tissue was analyzed for total and phosphorylated (p-) signaling proteins linked to the mTOR and AMPK networks. Results: Strength-training performance was similar between ST, ST-END, and END-ST. p-S6k1 was elevated from baseline 1 h posttraining in ST and ST-END (both P < .05). p-4E-BP1 was significantly lower than baseline post-ST (P = .01), whereas at 1 h postexercise in the ST-END condition p-4E-BP1 was significantly greater than postexercise (P = .04). p-ACC was elevated from baseline both postexercise and 1 h postexercise (both P < .05) in the END-ST condition. AMPK, mTOR, p38, PKB, and eEF2 responded similarly to ST, ST-END, and END-ST. Signaling responses to ST, ST-END, and END were largely similar. As such it cannot be ascertained which sequence of concurrent strength and endurance training is most favorable in promoting anabolic signaling. Conclusions: In the case of the current study an acute bout of concurrent training of differing sequences elicited similar responses of the AMPK and mTOR networks
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics
dc.subjectCombined exercise
dc.subjectmTOR
dc.subjectAMPK
dc.subjectExercise order
dc.subjectAnabolic signaling
dc.titleSignaling responses after varying sequencing of strength and endurance training in a fed state
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.researchID26084759 - Howatson, Glyn


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record