Stop the press: why censorship has made headline news (again)
Abstract
The recent publication of proposed amendments to the Films and Publications
Act 65 of 1996 drew some sharp criticism from the media. Some organisations
described these amendments as, inter alia, unconstitutional, outrageous and as
part of the erosion of freedom of speech, while the Department of Home Affairs
defended the amendments as an attempt to protect children from potentially
harmful and age-inappropriate material. This discussion briefly examines the
historical development of censorship as well as the current classification
process in South Africa, followed by a discussion of the proposed amendments
as well as the reaction thereto. The conclusion is that the media maybe has
overreacted with regard to some of the amendments and may not understand
the effect of the current classification process, while some of their concerns
with regard to some of the other amendments may be justified. The true
challenge will be that all stakeholders have an honest discussion with each
other and would have to try and strike a balance between the important right of
the child to dignity as well as his right to not be exploited, and that of the
freedom of speech. The printed media also will have to realise that it is the duty
of all members of society to protect the rights of the child and there can be no
reason as to why newspapers may be excluded from this duty.