Dispute resolution – an archaeological perspective with case studies from the South African Stone Age and San ethnography
Abstract
This paper presents an archaeological perspective on dispute resolution. Being a
discipline based primarily on tangible material remains, archaeology may be hard put to
draw firm conclusions on a phenomenon whose expression is usually intangible. It
nevertheless takes up the challenge to consider whether there are traces suggesting the
successful avoidance of conflict in the past. Drawing insights from South African Stone
Age archaeology and San ethnography, the evidence of unperturbed continuance of a
given cultural tradition is considered, as are indications of hxaro-like gift-giving
mechanisms known to reduce tension in ethnographic instances of the recent past.
Findings based on such indicators may be ambiguous. Evidence of negative outcomes in
terms of conflict and homicide would be more obvious and pertinent to dispute
resolution, specifically its failure. The role of “othering” in oral literature is referred to for
situations where external social distance is emphasised or where regulation of
inappropriate behaviour within a group is hinted at. The paper touches on the history of
colonial encroachment and genocide in the Karoo, and finally, on the role of heritage
itself as it becomes a locus of dispute in the present.